首页> 外文期刊>International journal of design engineering >A comparative analysis of six bionic design methods
【24h】

A comparative analysis of six bionic design methods

机译:六种仿生设计方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Design inspired by nature is getting to the forefront of the search for environmental sustainability. A number of design methods, intended especially to guide students and professionals from several disciplines in carrying out the development of biologically inspired design, have been proposed. The paper establishes a comparative analysis between six methods. These are presented in similar depth, with the parameters of analysis described. The analysis is based on scrutiny of the methods, in relation to the support given towards the attainment of four goals (form optimisation, organisational effectiveness, multiple requirements satisfaction and paradigm innovation for improved functional performance), considered of paramount importance to typical design endeavours aiming at achieving innovative concepts, optimisation of specific features or performance and environmental sustainability. The comparative analysis is intended to support designers in selecting a method that is adequate to the problem at hand. The analysis also identifies goals where the methods considered offer no or reduced support for their attainment, identifying the need for novel methodological proposals. As a conclusion, the requirement to integrate validation activities in the bionic design processes is emphasised.
机译:受自然启发的设计正在寻求环境可持续性的最前沿。已经提出了许多设计方法,特别是旨在指导来自多个学科的学生和专业人员进行生物启发性设计的开发。本文建立了六种方法之间的比较分析。这些以相似的深度呈现,并描述了分析参数。该分析基于对方法的审查,并与实现四个目标(形式优化,组织有效性,多重需求满意度和改进功能性能的范式创新)所提供的支持有关,这对于典型的设计工作目标至关重要。实现创新概念,优化特定功能或性能以及环境可持续性。比较分析旨在帮助设计人员选择适合当前问题的方法。该分析还确定了所考虑的方法对其实现不提供或减少支持的目标,并确定了对新颖方法学建议的需求。结论是,强调了将验证活动集成到仿生设计过程中的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号