• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of health care quality assurance >One eye of the future, one eye on the past The UK General Optical Council's approach to fitness to practise
【24h】

One eye of the future, one eye on the past The UK General Optical Council's approach to fitness to practise

机译：未来的眼光，过去的眼光英国通用光学理事会的健身实践方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The of this paper is to assess if the GOC considers relevant factors at all stages of its deliberations into misconduct, as required by the determinations in the cases of Cohen, Zygmunt, and Azzam, and to assess whether those circumstances described in the Hearings Guidance and Indicative Sanctions as warranting removal of an optician from the relevant registers lead to that outcome. Design/methodology/approach The consideration of specific factors in determining impairment of fitness to practise was compared with their subsequent consideration when determining the severity of sanction. Additionally, cases that highlighted aggravating circumstances deemed as serious enough to warrant removal were monitored. Pearson’s χ 2 test was used to detect any variation from the expected distribution of data. Findings In total, 42 cases met the inclusion criteria. Each of the four factors considered was more likely to be heard when determining sanction having first been factored in to the consideration of impairment. Where risk of harm was identified as an aspect of an optician’s misconduct, the sanctions of suspension or removal were no more likely to be imposed. Where dishonesty was involved, they were more likely to result in suspension or removal. Originality/value The GOC do, in general, factor the rulings of High Court appeal cases into their deliberations on the impairment of fitness to practice and, where dishonesty is involved, consider their own guidance in determining which sanction to apply. The authors were unable to show that placing the safety of patients at risk was more likely to result in removal from the register.
机译：本文的目的是评估科恩，齐格蒙特和阿扎姆案件的裁决是否需要，在GOC审议的各个阶段是否考虑到相关因素，并评估《听证指南》和《指示性制裁可确保从相关名册中移除眼镜商，从而导致上述结果。设计/方法/方法在确定制裁的严厉程度时，将在确定是否适合实践中考虑特定因素的考虑因素与随后考虑的因素进行了比较。此外，对突出显示严重情况以致需要撤职的案件进行了监测。皮尔逊（Pearson）的χ 2 检验用于检测预期数据分布的任何变化。结果总共有42例符合纳入标准。确定制裁时首先考虑减损的因素时，更容易听到所考虑的四个因素。如果将伤害风险确定为配镜师的不当行为的一部分，则不再可能实施制裁或吊销制裁。在涉及不诚实的地方，他们更有可能导致停职或撤职。独创性/价值GOC的确将高等法院上诉案件的裁决纳入其考虑是否适合实践的考虑之中，并且在涉及不诚实的情况下，在确定适用哪种制裁时应考虑自己的指导。作者无法证明将患者的安全置于危险之中更可能导致将患者从登记册中移除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号