• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Human Rights >Human Rights, Social Space and Power: Why do some NGOs Exert More Influence than Others?
【24h】

Human Rights, Social Space and Power: Why do some NGOs Exert More Influence than Others?

机译：人权，社会空间和权力：为什么一些非政府组织比其他组织更具影响力？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Employing Pierre Bourdieu's notion of 'social space', this paper attempts to lay bare how human rights NGOs attain the power needed to bring about social change. The paper argues that the strategies NGOs employ cannot explain their social and political impact for the basic reason that many NGOs use the same strategies and yet there is a large power differential among them. Using the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) as a case study, I show that it is the largest and most effective rights group in Israel due to its location in social space; that is, its closeness to sites of power (government, administrative and judicial institutions as well as corporations) as well as the economic, cultural, social and symbolic capital at its disposal. I go on to argue that spatial closeness to sites of power is a double-edged sword: it both enables the organisation to exert more influence and simultaneously inculcates it within the hegemonic worldview, circumscribing and restricting the universalistic agenda which should inform the activities of all human rights NGOs.
机译：本文采用皮埃尔·布迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu）的“社会空间”概念，试图揭示人权非政府组织如何获得实现社会变革所需的力量。本文认为，非政府组织采用的策略无法解释其社会和政治影响，其基本原因是许多非政府组织使用相同的策略，但它们之间的权力差异很大。以以色列民权协会（ACRI）为例，我发现由于其在社会空间中的位置，它是以色列最大和最有效的权利群体。就是说，它靠近权力场所（政府，行政和司法机构以及公司）以及可支配的经济，文化，社会和象征性资本。我继续争辩说，与权力场所的空间接近性是一把双刃剑：它既使组织能够发挥更大的影响力，又能在霸权世界观中灌输它，限制和限制了应该为所有人活动提供信息的普遍议程。人权非政府组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号