• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Assessing the potential of fuel cell-powered and battery-powered forklifts for reducing GHG emissions using clean surplus power; a game theory approach
【24h】

Assessing the potential of fuel cell-powered and battery-powered forklifts for reducing GHG emissions using clean surplus power; a game theory approach

机译：评估燃料电池供电和电池供电的叉车的潜力，用于使用清洁剩余功率降低温室气体排放;博弈论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This work aims at developing a game theory model for assessing the potential of fuel cellpowered and battery-powered forklifts for reducing GHG emissions in the province of Ontario, Canada. Two stakeholders are considered in the developed model: government and energy consumer. The energy consumer, which is assumed to be an industrial facility, operates 150 diesel forklifts but has the option of replacing them with fuel cell-powered and battery-powered forklifts. The government can encourage this replacement by allocating a percentage of Ontario's surplus power to the energy consumer at a discounted price. The discount is assumed to be exempting the energy consumer from paying the global adjustment. As a result, the energy consumer only pays the hourly Ontario electricity price when discounted power is available. Discounted electricity will decrease the cost of operating battery-powered and fuel cell-powered forklifts for the energy consumer and will encourage it to use those technologies instead of diesel forklifts. The government has an incentive to pursue such policy as the replacement of diesel forklifts with fuel cellpowered and battery-powered forklifts will reduce GHG emissions and subsequently, the social cost of carbon in the province. The reults of our modeling show that when the government does not allocate discounted power to the energy consumer, energy consumer does not reduce emissions and keeps using its 150 diesel forklifts. However, when the government provides 0.1% of Ontario's surplus power at each hour to the energy consumer at a discounted price, the energy consumer replaces 31 of its diesel forklifts with batterypowered forklifts. When the percentage of discounted power is 0.6% of Ontario's surplus power at each hour, energy consumer replaces 91 of its diesel forklifts with batterypowered forklifts and 54 of its diesel forklifts with fuel cellpowered forklifts.A policy of discounting surplus power to encourage replacing diesel forklifts with battery-powered and fuel cell-powered forklifts is shown to benefit both stakeholders in the system. Our analysis also shows that the deployment of both fuel-cell powered and battery-powered forklifts is effective in reducing GHG emissions in Ontario when surplus clean power is available. Battery-powered forklifts are more cost-effective when lower levels of discounted power are available; however, with an increase in the level of available discounted power, fuel cell-powered forklifts become more cost-effective technologies compared to battery-powered forklifts. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.
机译：这项工作旨在开发一种用于评估加拿大安大略省省内温室气体排放的燃料电流和电池供电的铲球潜力的博弈论。在发达的模式中考虑了两个利益攸关方：政府和能源消费者。假设是工业设施的能源消费者操作了150件柴油叉车，但可以选择用燃料电池供电和电池供电的叉车更换它们。政府可以通过折扣价格向能源消费者分配一定比例的安大略省剩余权力来鼓励这种替代。假设折扣豁免能源消费者支付全球调整。因此，能源消费者仅在折扣电源时支付每小时的Ontario电价。折扣电力将降低为能源消费者运营电池供电和燃料电池供电的铲球的成本，并鼓励它使用这些技术而不是柴油叉车。政府有激励措施，追求这种政策，因为替代柴油铲球与燃料电池电力和电池供电的叉车将减少温室气体排放，随后，省内碳的社会成本。我们的建模的恢复表明，当政府没有向能源消费者分配折扣的权力时，能源消费者不会减少排放，并使用其150件柴油叉车保持一致。然而，当政府以折扣价格向能源消费者提供0.1％的安大略省剩余电力时，能源消费者用电池用叉车取代其柴油叉车31次。当折扣电力百分比为安大略省剩余电力的0.6％，能源消费者将其柴油叉车的91件用电池药剂叉车和54个柴油叉车，其中柴油叉车有燃料电池叉车。折扣剩余力量的政策，以鼓励更换柴油叉车随着电池供电和燃料电池供电的叉车，显示为系统中的两个利益相关者受益。我们的分析还表明，燃料电池供电和电池供电的叉车的部署有效减少剩余清洁功率时减少安大略省的温室气体排放。电池供电的叉车在可获得较低水平的折扣功率时更具成本效益;然而，随着可用折扣电量的水平的增加，与电池供电的叉车相比，燃料电池供电的叉车技术变得更具成本效益的技术。 （c）2019年由elsevier有限公司发布代表氢能出版物LLC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号