• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of information systems in the service sector >Journal Rankings: Comparing Reputation, Citation and Acceptance Rates
【24h】

Journal Rankings: Comparing Reputation, Citation and Acceptance Rates

机译：期刊排名：比较声誉，引文和录取率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Research productivity is important in school reputation as well as individual faculty evaluation. In order to evaluate research productivity, the quality of research is often measured by proxy through the number of journal articles and ratings of the journals in which they appear. Because of this there is significant pressure on faculty to publish in the "top journals ". There are several metrics for evaluating and ranking journals, each of them with its own merits and limitations. Some commonly used quantitative measures of research quality are citation analyses, acceptance rates, and whether or not a journal is peer reviewed. Alternatively, journals can be ranked qualitatively into stratified groups based on reputation. Reputation, in turn, may be correlated with perceived values of quantitative measures, and thus is more subjective. The purpose of this research is to examine the extent of correlation between various measures of journal quality, in particular between quantitative and qualitative measures. The various measures are compared to examine the extent to which they are similar. Comparisons were also made among business departments. For this sample, overall journal rank was correlated with citation rate but not with acceptance rate. However, quantitative measures were not consistent among academic departments, indicating that journal rank can not be reliably used to make interdepartmental comparisons.
机译：研究效率对学校声誉以及个人教师评价都很重要。为了评估研究效率，通常通过代理人通过期刊文章的数量和期刊的等级来衡量研究的质量。因此，教师在“顶级期刊”上发表论文的压力很大。有几种评估和排名期刊的指标，每个指标都有其优点和局限性。一些常用的研究质量定量指标包括引文分析，接受率以及期刊是否经过同行评审。或者，可以根据声誉将期刊定性地分为分层组。反过来，声誉可能与量化措施的感知价值相关，因此更加主观。这项研究的目的是检验各种期刊质量度量之间的相关程度，尤其是定量和定性度量之间的相关程度。比较各种度量以检查它们的相似程度。业务部门之间也进行了比较。对于此样本，期刊的总体排名与引文率相关，但与接受率无关。但是，学术部门之间的量化指标不一致，这表明不能可靠地使用期刊排名进行部门间比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号