• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Manpower >The segmentation potential of non-standard employment: A four-country comparison of mobility patterns
【24h】

The segmentation potential of non-standard employment: A four-country comparison of mobility patterns

机译：非标准就业的细分潜力：四国流动模式比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – While forms of non-standard employment (which include part-time work and temporary employment) have received active promotion in recent years, possible negative effects emerging from these forms of employment have not been high on the agenda. This paper, accordingly, aims to compare workers with non-standard contracts and those with standard contracts in relation to transitions out of employment into unemployment, inactivity, household/care activities and education/training. Country differences in outcome are expected due to varying regulations of standard and non-standard employment and different reasons for resorting to forms of non-standard employment. Design/methodology/approach – The comparison covers four countries, namely Denmark, Germany, the UK and Spain. The segmentation theory is tested by analysing mobility patterns on the basis of the European Community Household Panel data. Event history analysis methods are used. Maximum likelihood multinomial regression models are calculated on the event history data in order to assess competing exits (unemployment, inactivity, household/care and education) between non-standard and standard workers. Findings – The risk of temporary workers exiting employment is greatest by far in Spain, but also evident in the other countries: casual employment is even more volatile than fixed-term employment. Concerning part-time workers, downward transitions to inactivity and/or household/care are much more frequent than among full-time workers, and this is true even in Spain and Denmark where part-time employment is not traditionally used to combine work with family activities. The expectation that there would be no differences in exits to unemployment – insofar as employment protection legislation applies to both full-time and regular part-time workers – proves true only for Denmark and Germany. Originality/value – In contrast to most papers on the segmentation potential of non-standard employment this paper is comparative. Furthermore, it uses event history methods and places a special focus on potentially employability-enhancing “sideways transitions” to education/training measures.
机译：目的–尽管近年来非正规就业形式（包括兼职工作和临时就业）得到了积极促进，但这些就业形式可能产生的负面影响并未提上议事日程。因此，本文旨在比较与非标准合同的工人和具有标准合同的工人在失业，失业，无业，家庭/护理活动以及教育/培训方面的过渡。由于标准和非标准就业法规的不同以及诉诸非标准就业形式的不同原因，预计结果的国家差异。设计/方法/方法–比较覆盖了四个国家，即丹麦，德国，英国和西班牙。细分理论是通过根据欧洲共同体家庭面板数据分析流动性模式进行检验的。使用事件历史分析方法。根据事件历史数据计算最大似然多项式回归模型，以评估非标准工人与标准工人之间的竞争性退出（失业，无业，家庭/护理和教育）。调查结果–到目前为止，临时工退出就业的风险在西班牙最大，但在其他国家也很明显：临时工比定期工更加动荡。关于非全日制工人，向无业和/或家庭/护理的向下转换要比全日制工人更为频繁，即使在西班牙和丹麦，传统上不使用非全日制工作来兼顾工作与家庭的情况下，也是如此。活动。仅就丹麦和德国而言，就就业保护立法适用于全职和正规兼职工人而言，期望失业率不会有差异的事实才得到证实。原创性/价值–与大多数关于非标准就业细分潜力的论文形成对比。此外，它使用事件历史方法，并特别关注潜在的增强就业能力的“横向过渡”到教育/培训措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号