...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Process Systems Engineering >Risk assessment: methods on purpose?
【24h】

Risk assessment: methods on purpose?

机译：风险评估：有目的的方法？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When considering three proven methods of risk assessment widely used within energy sector, PHA, FMEA and HAZOP, the question of the adequacy of the method to objectives is raised. After introducing the methodological framework for risk assessment, we take a look at an overview of the three methods. From a perspective shaped by systemic paradigm, we propose the concept of symptom, as thread running through of each method. After detailing the specific symptoms for each method, we put forward two hypotheses. First, a method is not neutral and symptoms are a sign of inclination and drive representations of the scenarios developed. Second, risk assessment workshops, seen as privileged locations for organisational learning, change the relationship between actors and hazardous situations. By locating each method within the triangulation of definition from the systemic paradigm, we invite risk assessment experts to make their tacit knowledge as explicit as possible in order to identify operational levers to control their activity.
机译：在考虑广泛用于能源行业的三种行之有效的风险评估方法（PHA，FMEA和HAZOP）时，提出了该方法是否符合目标的问题。在介绍了风险评估的方法框架之后，我们将对这三种方法进行概述。从系统范式的角度出发，我们提出症状的概念，将其作为贯穿每种方法的线程。在详细介绍每种方法的具体症状之后，我们提出了两个假设。首先，一种方法不是中立的，症状是倾向的迹象，并驱动着所发展的场景。其次，风险评估研讨会被视为组织学习的特权场所，它改变了参与者与危险情况之间的关系。通过将每种方法定位在系统范式的定义三角剖分中，我们邀请风险评估专家让他们的隐性知识尽可能地明确，以便确定控制其活动的操作杠杆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号