...
【24h】

Lean schools of thought

机译:精益思想流派

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Academia has produced theoretical and practical knowledge about lean for over 30 years, and for that reason, research is in a mature phase. To organise this knowledge, we propose a typology of lean schools of thought. Schools were categorised into two paradigms of organisational analysis - interpretivist and functionalist - to clarify theoretical assumptions about how each conducts scientific investigations and what contributions they generate. Seven schools were identified: systems engineering, systems architecture, operations research, organisational development, contingency systems, socio-technical systems and evolutionary. Persistent practical problems should guide production and operations management research such as the difficulties companies face with adoption and sustainability of lean practices. The typology proposed in this study provides a theoretical framework and a respective school for these problematical situations. The evolutionary school in the interpretivist paradigm seems to be more appropriate; action research as a methodology should be used since it is consistent with interpretivism assumptions. The originality of this paper lies within a proposal of lean schools of thought not found in the literature. Directions for research that have more meaning for companies seeking lean transformation are proposed.
机译:学术界已经积累了30多年关于精益的理论和实践知识,因此,研究处于成熟阶段。为了组织这些知识,我们提出了一种精益思想流派的类型学。学校被分为组织分析的两种范式-解释论者和功能论者-阐明了关于每家如何进行科学调查及其产生的贡献的理论假设。确定了七所学校:系统工程,系统架构,运筹学,组织发展,应急系统,社会技术系统和进化论。持续存在的实际问题应指导生产和运营管理研究,例如公司在采用和遵循精益实践方面面临的困难。本研究提出的类型学为这些问题情况提供了理论框架和相应的流派。诠释主义范式中的进化学派似乎更合适。应将行动研究作为一种方法,因为它与解释主义的假设是一致的。本文的独创性在于在文献中找不到精益思想的提议。提出了对寻求精益转型的公司更有意义的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号