• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Work study >Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis
【24h】

Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis

机译：使用动态数据包络分析的高等教育机构性能排名的客观性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - There has been a persistent debate on measures of efficiency and ranking procedures of higher education institutions (HEIs). Deriving absolute efficiency measures and their ranking provide a critical input for the society to choose the appropriate educational institute. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the relative performance of institutions in management education in different locations in India and propose a holistic efficiency measurement which can be applied to HEIs in general. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses dynamic data envelopment analysis (DDEA) as the primary methodology of analysis. Multiple measures of inputs and output have been defined to assess efficiency in institutions of management education. Some of the output variables used for measuring relative effectiveness are: the number of students placed, number of entrepreneurs, median CTC of placed students, total number of students passed, number of research publications, number of students and faculty who have participated in international exchange, input variables used, student intake, faculty profile, resource allocation on the development of student, faculty and staff, industry linkages, alumni network. The institutions under study are in three different locations in India, having distinct characteristics. The multiple measures of inputs and outputs defined have been used to measure efficiency, following which DDEA was used to rank the efficiency measures. Findings - Various agencies use their framework to evaluate and rank HEIs; however, they are either subjective or less researched methodologies. The proposed method acts as a new researched and objective methodology for ranking of HEIs operating across regions with different societal, economic and political contexts. Efficiency in education is of high relevance today for various stakeholders such as students, parents, industry, policy-makers and government. An objective, such as the one proposed in this paper, would be helpful in satisfying the needs of various stakeholders. Furthermore, the government has policies of allocating funds, in case of public-funded institutions, based on efficiency levels in HEIs. The measure using DDEA suggested in this study provides a better measurement of efficiency. Research limitations/implications - This research is based on the extension of DDEA with slight modification to the denominator portion of efficiency calculation. The modification is accentuated by taking an industry benchmark or government benchmark. This may lead to slight difficulty in the appropriation of input parameters. Hence, selection of appropriate input and output parameters is the key limitation. To demonstrate capabilities of the proposed approach, this framework is implemented for performance evaluation of institutions of higher education in India. Some helpful policy-making and managerial insights are derived from the numerical results. Originality/value - The uniqueness of this research is that it adds a well-researched methodology based on DDEA to measure efficiency and rank HEIs for effective assessment and benchmarking. The frameworks used so far have been either subjective or less researched methodologies.
机译：目的 - 就高等教育机构的效率和排名程序（HEIS）持续辩论辩论。导出绝对效率措施及其排名为社会选择适当的教育研究所提供了一个关键的投入。本文的目的是评估在印度不同地点管理教育中的机构的相对表现，并提出了一种全面效率测量，这可以将其应用于赫斯。设计/方法/方法 - 本研究使用动态数据包络分析（DDEA）作为分析的主要方法。已经定义了多种投入和产出措施，以评估管理教育机构的效率。用于测量相对效果的一些输出变量是：所安置的学生人数，企业家数量，中位数CTC的学生，学生总数通过，研究出版物数量，参加国际交流的学生人数，学生人数数量，使用的输入变量，学生摄入，教师外形，资源分配关于学生，教师和员工，行业联系，校友网络。研究机构在印度的三个不同的位置，具有明显的特征。已经用于测量效率的多种输入和输出的多种措施，遵循DDEA用于对效率措施进行排名。调查结果 - 各种代理商使用他们的框架来评估和排名赫斯;但是，它们是主观的或更少的研究方法。该拟议的方法充当了跨越不同社会，经济和政治环境的地区运作的新研究和客观方法。对于学生，父母，行业，政策制定者和政府等各种利益相关者，教育效率具有高相关者。一个目标，例如本文提出的目标，有助于满足各利益相关者的需求。此外，根据赫沙的效率水平，政府在公共资金机构的情况下，政府有政策。本研究中建议使用DDEA的措施提供了更好的效率测量。研究限制/影响 - 本研究基于DDEA的延伸，对效率计算的分母部分具有轻微修改。通过采用行业基准或政府基准，修改是强调的。这可能导致输入参数的拨款略微困难。因此，选择适当的输入和输出参数是关键限制。为了证明拟议方法的能力，该框架是为印度高等教育机构的绩效评估而实施。一些有用的政策制定和管理洞察力来自数值结果。原创/价值 - 本研究的独特性是它基于DDEA增加了一种良好的方法，以衡量有效评估和基准的效率和等级。到目前为止所使用的框架是主观的或更少的研究方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号