• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Producitivity and perfoemance management >Logistics flexibility: a systematic review
【24h】

Logistics flexibility: a systematic review

机译：物流灵活性：系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - There is a lack of consensus in conceptualizing and defining logistics flexibility as a distinct construct among supply chain scholars. The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyze the existing literature on logistics flexibility. Design/methodology/approach - By taking a systematic approach to literature review, a total of 100 academic articles were content analyzed. As a general framework, the classification broadly provided by Zhang et al (2002,2003,2005,2006) was applied in order to increase the consistency and validity of the review. Findings - The results show that logistics flexibility has gained an increasing academic attention in the past two decades in terms of the number of published articles. First, the various terminologies often used in relation to logistics flexibility are explored. Second, the definitions of logistics flexibility at various levels of analysis are presented along with methodological considerations of the current literature. It is shown that most of the existing articles claim to study the matter at the chain level. The main methodological tools used in studying logistics flexibility are revealed as well as the fact that the majority of the empirical studies correspond to the manufacturing industry. Moreover, a synthesis of the principal measures used to gauge logistics flexibility is provided. Finally, current and emerging themes in logistics flexibility research are highlighted. The study also underlines the main measures used in studying logistics flexibility. Research limitations/implications - This paper only focusses on academic articles published in journals and does not include other contributions such as books, etc. The systematic literature review facilitates further conceptual and empirical studies; however, more narrative literature reviews could complement the results of this study. Originality/value - This paper is unique in the sense that it specifically reviews the literature on logistics flexibility in a systematic fashion. The content analysis has been carried out using NVivo 10 enabling the systematic nature of the review as well as increasing the pedagogical value of the method.%Performance; Systematic literature review; Postponement; Uncertainty; Logistics flexibility
机译：目的-在将物流灵活性概念化和定义为供应链学者之间的独特结构时，缺乏共识。本文的目的是系统地分析有关物流灵活性的现有文献。设计/方法/方法-通过系统的文献综述方法，对100篇学术文章进行了内容分析。作为一般框架，采用了Zhang等人（2002、2003、2005、2006）广泛提供的分类方法，以提高评价的一致性和有效性。结果-结果显示，在过去的20年中，就已发表文章的数量而言，物流灵活性已获得了越来越多的学术关注。首先，探讨了经常与物流灵活性相关的各种术语。其次，介绍了各种分析级别的物流灵活性定义，以及当前文献的方法学考虑。结果表明，大多数现有文章声称要在链级研究此问题。揭示了用于研究物流灵活性的主要方法论工具，以及大多数经验研究与制造业相对应的事实。此外，提供了用于衡量物流灵活性的主要措施的综合。最后，重点介绍了物流灵活性研究中的当前和新兴主题。该研究还强调了用于研究物流灵活性的主要措施。研究的局限性/意义-本文仅关注期刊上发表的学术文章，不包括书籍等其他贡献。系统的文献综述有助于进一步的概念和实证研究；然而，更多的叙述性文献综述可以补充这项研究的结果。原创性/价值-本文的独特之处在于，它以系统的方式专门回顾了有关物流灵活性的文献。内容分析是使用NVivo 10进行的，它使审查具有系统性，并提高了该方法的教学价值。系统的文献综述；推迟；不确定;物流灵活性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号