• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Work study >Considering connectivity in operations journals
【24h】

Considering connectivity in operations journals

机译：考虑运营日记帐中的连接性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the coverage of identified topics that represent three key themes of change in management practice. These themes, focused on the new interconnected modern business operation, consist of: cross-functional or process-based working, supply networks, and systems thinking. The paper seeks to examine the coverage of these themes in operations journals as a proxy to determine how well the academic operations community is adapting to the interconnected business world.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Two separate lists compiled to rank the quality of operations journals (one based in the UK, the other in the USA) are used to structure a search for keywords representing the identified connectivity themes in the identified "top" leading operations journals to determine how well the different topics are covered. The term "operations" is intended to refer to the related specialities of both operations management and operations research. Findings - Findings indicate overall very weak coverage of the three connectivity topics. Systems thinking was best represented. However, this representation was not in operations management journals but predominantly operations research sources. Both supply network and cross-functional working were poorly represented as topics more generally. The implication of the findings is that the operations literature has yet to embrace key issues of connectivity and greater attention should therefore be paid to these areas to better inform business practice.rnOriginality/value - To the best of one's knowledge no such study of this type or breadth has been previously conducted.
机译：目的-本文的目的是研究确定的主题的涵盖范围，这些主题代表了管理实践变化的三个关键主题。这些主题集中在新的，相互关联的现代业务运营上，包括：跨职能或基于流程的工作，供应网络和系统思考。本文旨在研究运营期刊中这些主题的覆盖范围，以此来确定学术运营社区对互连的商业世界的适应程度.rn设计/方法/方法-编制了两个单独的清单以对运营期刊的质量进行排名（一个位于英国，另一个在美国）用于搜索代表已确定的“领先”领先运营期刊中代表已确定的连通性主题的关键字，以确定覆盖不同主题的程度。术语“操作”是指操作管理和操作研究的相关专业。调查结果-调查结果表明这三个连通性主题的总体覆盖范围很弱。系统思维得到最好的体现。但是，这种代表不是出现在运营管理期刊上，而是主要出现在运营研究来源中。供应网络和跨职能工作都没有很好地代表主题。研究结果的含义是，运营文献尚未涵盖连通性的关键问题，因此应更加关注这些领域，以更好地指导业务实践。rn原创性/价值-就我们所知，尚无此类研究或之前已经进行过广度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号