首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Productivity and performance management >Structural violence and productivity: The role of business and the United Nations Global Compact
【24h】

Structural violence and productivity: The role of business and the United Nations Global Compact

机译:结构性暴力与生产力:企业与联合国全球契约的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper seeks to provide information about the concept of "structural violence"; to explain this as a barrier to the development of productivity; and to inform about the Global Compact, a United Nations initiative designed to reduce structural violence. Design/methodology/approach - The concept of structural violence is explained and then the history and development of the Global Compact are outlined. From this lessons are drawn for policy-makers and industry leaders. Findings - Structural violence is often unintended; a consequence of political structures and cultural norms, part of the "dominant logic". It must be addressed specifically and is best addressed on a partnership basis by all key stakeholders. The Global Compact is an enabling framework, which allows discussion, promotes research, and encourages action towards ending structural violence. Practical implications - At the policy level, the challenge is to probe the relationship between structural violence, dominant logic and business behaviour/impact and to create an enabling environment to go beyond isolated measures and "end of pipe" solutions to poverty, exclusion and pollution that, while providing relief and tackling symptoms, have yet to prove effective enough in generating inclusive, timely and sustainable prosperity. Originality/value - Shows the direct link between structural violence and productivity restriction. Suggests approaches that should help individuals, teams and organisations think about their own part in this phenomenon. Cites examples of changes in "dominant logic" that can help support such approaches.
机译:目的-本文旨在提供有关“结构性暴力”概念的信息;解释这是生产力发展的障碍;并告知全球契约,这是一项旨在减少结构性暴力的联合国倡议。设计/方法/方法-说明了结构暴力的概念,然后概述了全球契约的历史和发展。从中吸取教训,供决策者和行业领导者参考。调查结果-结构性暴力通常是意外的;政治结构和文化规范的结果,是“主导逻辑”的一部分。必须特别解决该问题,所有主要利益相关者最好在合作关系的基础上解决它。全球契约是一个扶持性的框架,它允许讨论,促进研究并鼓励采取行动制止结构性暴力。实际意义-在政策层面,挑战是探究结构性暴力,主导逻辑与商业行为/影响之间的关系,并创造一个有利的环境,超越孤立的措施和“穷途末路”的解决贫困,排斥和污染的解决方案在提供缓解和缓解症状的同时,还没有证明足以有效地产生包容,及时和可持续的繁荣。原创性/价值-显示结构性暴力与生产力限制之间的直接联系。建议的方法应有助于个人,团队和组织考虑自己在这种现象中的角色。列举了可以帮助支持这种方法的“主导逻辑”变化的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号