【24h】

Guest editorial

机译:客座社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recurrent theme in the government of many European states is that the "dispersion of governance across multiple jurisdictions is both more efficient than and normatively superior to central state monopoly" (Marks and Hooghe, 2004, p. 16). This reflects several influences. The first is that over recent decades those functions that were once the sole responsibility of central governments have "spun away" to be administered at either sub-national or European levels. Second, neo-liberal orthodoxy asserts that increased globalisation has reduced the capacity of states to intervene to secure spatially equitable levels of economic development and that sub-national actors should play an active role in promoting the "endogenous" economic capacities of their territories. Third, there have been growing "bottom-up" pressures on European governments to acknowledge the sense of distinctiveness felt by territorial communities, for example the Basque Country, Brittany, Flanders, and Northern Italy, based on cultural and linguistic, minority nationalisms and economic differences and demands for greater autonomy (Jeffery, 2008; Guibernau, 2007; Loughlin, 2007).
机译:欧洲许多国家的政府反复出现的一个主题是:“将治理分散到多个司法管辖区既比中央国家垄断更有效率,并且在规范上优于中央国家垄断”(Marks和Hooghe,2004年,第16页)。这反映了几种影响。首先是在过去的几十年中,那些曾经由中央政府全权负责的职能已经“剥离”到地方或欧洲各级。第二,新自由主义正统论断说,全球化的加剧降低了国家干预以确保空间上公平的经济发展水平的能力,而次国家行为者应在促进其领土的“内生”经济能力方面发挥积极作用。第三,对欧洲各国政府的“自下而上”的压力越来越大,它们承认基于文化和语言,少数民族民族主义和经济基础的巴斯克地区,布列塔尼,法兰德斯和意大利北部等领土社区所感受到的与众不同的感觉。差异和更大自治的要求(Jeffery,2008; Guibernau,2007; Loughlin,2007)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号