...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Public appointments as a tool for public governance: a systematic literature review
【24h】

Public appointments as a tool for public governance: a systematic literature review

机译：公共任命作为公共治理的工具：系统文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review previous research on public appointments to systematize existing knowledge, identify gaps and discuss implications for future research in this field. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is based on a systematic literature review, carried out using the Scopus database. We selected academic articles published in journals ranked in the 2018 CABS Academic Journal Guide plus public administration articles in journals classified by Google as falling within the areas of public policy and administration. The papers were analysed according to four categories: geographical area, theoretical framework, research method and organizational setting. Findings - Results show the lack of research regarding areas like Latin America or East Asia; from a theoretical viewpoint, given the lack of explicit theoretical approaches, future research should have more formal and clear theoretical frameworks. Moreover, given the dominance of case study and review/reflection studies, alternative research methods, such as surveys or mixed methods are suggested for future works. Research limitations/implications - We identify a new research agenda to revive the focus on public appointments as a tool for intra- and inter-organizational governance in the public sector. Specifically, we argue that how the process of public appointments is managed has huge democratic implications, and public managers have a key role to play in that respect by designing effective governance systems and organizational procedures. The selection of papers has been limited to articles published in peer- review journals ranked in the 2018 CABS Guide; no distinctions have been made regarding journals' positioning in the ranking. Moreover, this work takes a managerial and organizational approach, while the research on public appointments is clearly interdisciplinary, with previous contributions coming mainly from political scientists. Originality/value - Despite the relevant body of literature on this topic, this study represents the first manuscript to summarize the state of the art of this theme, providing a research agenda on this very relevant but quite neglected issue in public governance.
机译：目的 - 本文的目的是审查以前关于公共任命的研究，以系统化现有知识，确定差距并讨论对该领域的未来研究的影响。设计/方法/方法 - 本文基于系统的文献综述，使用Scopus数据库进行。我们选择了在2018年旅馆学术期刊指南的期刊上发表的学术文章加上谷歌分类的期刊的公共行政文章作为落在公共政策和行政领域。根据四类分析论文：地理区域，理论框架，研究方法和组织环境。调查结果 - 结果表明，关于拉丁美洲或东亚等地区的研究缺乏研究;从理论上的观点来看，鉴于缺乏明确的理论方法，未来的研究应该具有更正式和明确的理论框架。此外，鉴于案例研究和审查/反思研究的主导地位，建议未来作品的替代研究方法，例如调查或混合方法。研究限制/含义 - 我们确定了一个新的研究议程，以恢复公共设施的重点是公共部门在组织间治理的工具。具体而言，我们认为公共任命的过程是如何管理巨大的民主影响，公共管理人员通过设计有效的治理系统和组织程序在这方面发挥着关键作用。这些文件的选择仅限于在2018年CABS指南中排名的同行审查期刊上发表的文章;对排名中的期刊定位没有任何区别。此外，这项工作采取管理和组织方法，而公共任命的研究显然是跨学科，主要来自政治科学家。原创性/价值 - 尽管有关本主题的相关文献，但本研究代表了总结本主题艺术状况的第一个稿件，在公共治理方面提供了一项关于这一相关但非常被忽视的问题的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号