首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >Acting the Part: Can Non-State Entities Provide Protection Under International Refugee Law?
【24h】

Acting the Part: Can Non-State Entities Provide Protection Under International Refugee Law?

机译:扮演角色:非国家实体可以根据国际难民法提供保护吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the concept of a non-state actor of protection under European Union asylum law and the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. The need to grapple with this concept has arisen primarily from the wording of article 7(1) of the EC Qualification Directive, which sets out an expansive interpretation of non-state actors, and the decision of the European Court of Justice in Abdulla and ors, which extends this concept to multinational forces. The EC Qualification Directive is said to be based on the 1951 Convention, but this article questions whether article 7(1) is in fact consistent with that Convention. More broadly, the article addresses the complex question of the role of non-state actors within the international refugee law framework and the meaning of refugee ‘protection’. Does the concept of ‘protection’ involve particular functions and attributes that only states can provide? In this regard, the article seeks to reconceptualise the non-state actor debate by highlighting the importance of the state-citizen relationship underlying refugeehood. This new element in the debate provides a much needed theoretical model for analyzing the concept of non state actors of protection that may assist in reaching both a principled and pragmatic answer to the complex legal questions raised.
机译:本文研究了欧盟庇护法和1951年《关于难民地位的公约》规定的非国家保护行为者的概念。解决这一概念的必要性主要来自EC资格指令第7条第1款的措辞,该条款对非国家行为者进行了广泛的解释,以及欧洲法院在阿卜杜拉和,将这一概念扩展到多国部队。欧共体资格指令据说是基于1951年《公约》,但本条质疑第7条第(1)款实际上是否与该公约一致。更广泛地讲,该文章解决了非国家行为者在国际难民法框架内的作用以及难民“保护”的含义这一复杂问题。 “保护”的概念是否涉及只有国家才能提供的特定功能和属性?在这方面,本文通过强调难民身份背后的国家与公民关系的重要性,试图重新概念化非国家行为者的辩论。辩论中的这一新内容为分析非国家保护行为者的概念提供了急需的理论模型,这可能有助于对提出的复杂法律问题做出有原则性和实用性的回答。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2012年第1期|p.85-110|共26页
  • 作者

    Maria O’Sullivan*;

  • 作者单位

    *Lecturer, Faculty of Law, and Associate, Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号