• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >International Law and Detention of US Asylum Seekers: Contrasting Matter of D-J- with the United Nations Refugee Convention
【24h】

International Law and Detention of US Asylum Seekers: Contrasting Matter of D-J- with the United Nations Refugee Convention

机译：国际法与美国寻求庇护者的拘留：D-J-与《联合国难民公约》的不同之处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

US refugee law reflects an ever-increasing conception that the application of international standards would constitute an unacceptable risk to national security. CSR Article 31(2)’s requirement that refugees ‘shall not’ be detained unless ‘necessary’ appears among the chief casualties of such suspicions. US jurisprudence remains strikingly devoid of reference to Article 31, and 2003’s Matter of D-J- is a prime example. D-J- was an administrative decision in which the US Attorney General held that national security required all US asylum seekers who successfully arrive via boat must be subject to mandatory detention throughout the course of removal proceedings. Despite US accession to the Protocol, Article 31(2) was not mentioned.
机译：美国难民法反映出一种日益增长的观念，即采用国际标准将对国家安全构成不可接受的风险。 《企业社会责任》第31条第2款要求，除非在此类怀疑的主要受害者中出现“必要”，否则不得“拘留”难民。美国的判例仍然没有提及第31条，而2003年的D-J-问题是一个很好的例子。 D-J-是一项行政决定，美国总检察长认为，国家安全要求所有成功乘船抵达美国的寻求庇护者必须在遣返程序中受到强制拘留。尽管美国加入了该议定书，但未提及第31条第2款。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2007年第4期|661-702|共42页
  • 作者

    Alicia Triche Naumik;

  • 作者单位

    Alicia Triche Naumik is a former CLINIC detention attorney who is currently composing a doctoral thesis on international refugee law and ‘national security’ at Oxford University. She is also a part-time appellate attorney at Nesom Law Office in Oakdale Louisiana where she specializes in removal defense. This article is based loosely on a Master of Studies degree awarded by the Oxford Law Faculty in Oct. 2003. The author wishes to express profound gratitude to all who have helped make this submission possible most especially (in chronological order) Andrew Shacknove;

    the US-UK Fulbright Commission;

    Andrew Painter Elizabeth Dallam and Jane Kochman of UNHCR;

    Guy Goodwin-Gill;

    Anna Nagrath and Siarhei Naumik. The author also wishes to thank Professors Goodwin-Gill and Mark Von Sternberg and the Oxford Public International Law seminar group for their commentary on earlier versions of this article. Citation is current as of 30 Nov. 2007;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号