【24h】

Protection Elsewhere/Nowhere

机译:在其他地方/无处保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Australian Government takes the position that it does not owe protection obligations to an asylum seeker who could have sought protection elsewhere. In taking this position it is purporting to invoke the so-called ‘safe third country’ principle which has developed out of international practice. This article examines Australia's purported applications of the ‘safe third country’ principle and concludes that in some instances they represent an attempt to extend that principle beyond what the international community presently considers acceptable or ever should consider acceptable.
机译:澳大利亚政府的立场是,它不对寻求庇护的人负有保护义务,而寻求庇护的人本可以在其他地方寻求保护。采取这一立场的目的是援引国际惯例发展而来的所谓的“安全第三国”原则。本文研究了澳大利亚所谓的“安全第三国”原则的适用,并得出结论,在某些情况下,它们代表了将这一原则扩大到国际社会目前认为可以接受或曾经认为可以接受的范围的尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号