...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of selection and assessment >Designing Selection Systems for Medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts
【24h】

Designing Selection Systems for Medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts

机译：设计医学选择系统：在高风险选择环境中平衡预测和政治有效性的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Selection into medical education and training is a high-5talces process. A key unanswered issue is the effectiveness of measuring noncognitive predictors via both low-fidelity and high-fidelity selection approaches in this high-stakes context. We review studies investigating the effectiveness of multiple selection instruments in terms of predictive validity, incremental validity, and applicant reactions in both entry-level and advanced-level medical selection. Our results show that the situational judgment test (SJT) is the best single predictor of performance, operationalized in multiple ways. In addition, the low-fidelity SJT has incremental predictive power over cognitively oriented tests, and high-fidelity assessment center (AC) exercises add incremental validity over the low-fidelity (and less costly) selection methods. Concerning applicant reactions, results show that overall, the selection system is positively received. However, the method with the highest predictive validity - the SJT - received comparatively lower face validity ratings which may present a 'justice dilemma' for employers. Furthermore, various other stakeholders have a political interest in the selection methods used (e.g., government, the regulators and trade unions).
机译：选择参加医学教育和培训是一个高5级的过程。关键的未解决问题是在这种高风险环境中通过低保真和高保真选择方法来测量非认知预测指标的有效性。我们回顾了有关在入门级和高级医学选择中的预测有效性，递增有效性和申请人反应方面对多种选择工具的有效性进行调查的研究。我们的结果表明，情境判断测试（SJT）是绩效的最佳单一预测指标，可以通过多种方式进行操作。此外，低保真SJT在面向认知的测试中具有递增的预测能力，而高保真评估中心（AC）练习在低保真（且成本较低）选择方法上增加了递增的有效性。关于申请人的反应，结果表明，总体而言，甄选制度受到好评。然而，具有最高预测效度的方法-SJT-获得相对较低的面部效度评级，这可能为雇主带来“正义困境”。此外，其他各种利益相关者（例如政府，监管机构和工会）对所采用的选择方法也具有政治利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号