• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of signs and semiotic systems >Minds and Machines: Limits to Simulations of Thought and Action
【24h】

Minds and Machines: Limits to Simulations of Thought and Action

机译：思维与机器：思维与行动模拟的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although distinctions can be drawn between relations of simulation, replication, and emulation, basic differences between digital machines and human beings render the strong forms of anticipation of outputs from imputs impossible in principle. Because the use of signs in affecting behavior is dependent on a context of preexisting motives, beliefs, ethics, abilities and capabilities, ontic and epistemic difficulties relative to the complex interaction of distinct variables and relevant conditions to which each person has been subjected in his or her unique life, makes non-trivial explanations and predictions—ones not involving stereotyped or scripted behavior—theoretically impossible, including for the weakest forms of simulation. Indeed, even stereotypical behavior may not be predicable on similar grounds for real, historical human beings, not only in general but even for each single case. This study may also be viewed as an essay about freedom of the will.
机译：尽管可以在模拟，复制和仿真的关系之间进行区分，但是数字机器和人类之间的基本差异使从原理上预测输出的强大形式从原理上讲是不可能的。因为在影响行为的过程中使用符号取决于先前动机，信念，道德，能力和能力，本体论和认识论上的困难，而这些挑战涉及不同变量和相关条件的复杂交互作用，每个人在其或她的独特生活使理论上不可能做出不平凡的解释和预测（其中不涉及定型观念或脚本行为），包括最弱的模拟形式。确实，即使是刻板印象的行为也可能无法基于相似的理由对真实的历史人类做出预测，不仅是一般而言，甚至是每种情况。这项研究也可以被视为关于意志自由的论文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号