...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy >Multi-level governance and universalism: Austria and Germany compared
【24h】

Multi-level governance and universalism: Austria and Germany compared

机译：多层次的治理与普遍主义：奥地利和德国的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – The paper compares the introduction of universal long-term care schemes and the regulations of migrant care work within the framework of multi-level governance in Austria and Germany. The aim of the paper is twofold. First, it reveals the characteristics of country-specific universal policy schemes and second, it explains their designs – the new type of universalism and its completion by regulations of migrant care work within the family framework – by the policy-making process. Design/methodology/approach – Conceptually, the paper combines approaches within long-term care research to define dimensions of universalism, as well as on multi-level governance and new-institutionalism to examine the policy-making process. Empirically, Austria and Germany are selected as two cases. Findings – The findings reveal the significant dimensions of the new type of universalist policy design and of policies towards migrant care work. The country differences are explained by the policy-making process within countries and with cross-border effects. In particular, the impact of the disability movement in Austria and the coalition between the political parties in Germany resulted in a country-specific definition of universalism. The integrated approach towards migrant care work in Austria is contrasted with the fragmented approach in Germany. In both countries, the regulations of migrant care work question the idea of universalism. Originality/value – The impact of societal actors and their ideas on the creation of a new type of universalism and the interrelated regulation of migrant care work has only rarely been examined. The analysis contributes to an understanding of the policy-making process and its interrelationship with selected policy designs.
机译：目的–本文在奥地利和德国的多级治理框架内比较了普遍长期护理计划的引入和移民护理工作的规定。本文的目的是双重的。首先，它揭示了针对特定国家的普遍政策计划的特征；其次，它通过政策制定过程解释了它们的设计，即新型普遍主义及其在家庭框架内通过对移民照料工作的监管来完成。设计/方法论/方法-从概念上讲，本文结合了长期护理研究中的方法来定义普遍主义的范畴，以及在多级治理和新制度主义上研究决策过程。根据经验，奥地利和德国被选为两种情况。调查结果–调查结果揭示了新型普遍主义政策设计和移民护理工作政策的重要方面。国家差异可以通过国家内部的决策过程来解释，并具有跨国影响。特别是，奥地利残疾人运动的影响以及德国各政党之间的联合产生了针对特定国家的普遍主义定义。奥地利对移民照料工作的综合方法与德国的零散方法形成对照。在这两个国家，移民照料工作的法规对普遍主义的观念提出了质疑。原创性/价值–很少研究社会行为者及其思想对新型新型普遍主义的产生以及对移民照料工作的相关规定的影响。分析有助于理解决策过程及其与选定的政策设计之间的相互关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号