• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sustainable transportation >Determinants of residential dissonance: Implications for transit-oriented development in Brisbane
【24h】

Determinants of residential dissonance: Implications for transit-oriented development in Brisbane

机译：居民不和谐的决定因素：对布里斯班公交导向型发展的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Residential dissonance is the mismatch of land use patterns between individuals' actual and preferred neighborhood type. It is a threat to land-use-based policy interventions, such as transit-oriented development (TOD), which aims to enhance sustainable mobility behavior. Dissonants in TOD are more likely to use the car and less likely to use public transport. They do not naturally adjust their preferences according to their surrounding land use patterns and continue their predisposed travel behavior. Therefore, it is critical to identify dissonant groups to inform policy development to lessen the level of dissonance in TODs. This research identifies groups that are more likely to be dissonant in TODon-TOD areas in Brisbane. The living conditions of 6271 individuals were classified into TOD or non-TOD types based on a cluster analysis of built environmental factors. Individuals' preferred neighborhoods were also categorized into TOD and non-TOD types based on a factor analysis of travel attitudes and preferences. Four unique groups were identified (dissonants and consonants in both TOD and non-TOD areas) when respondents' actual and preferred neighborhood types were combined. Binary logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the determinants of residential dissonance in TODon-TOD areas. The results indicate that 30% of the respondents living in TOD areas are dissonants. Individuals who are male, have a car available at all times, and/or have poor health conditions were more likely to be dissonants in TOD areas in Brisbane.
机译：居住失调是个人的实际和偏好的邻居类型之间土地使用模式的不匹配。这对基于土地使用的政策干预措施（如公交导向发展（TOD））构成了威胁，该干预措施旨在增强可持续的出行行为。 TOD中的不谐调者更可能使用汽车，而不太可能使用公共交通工具。他们不会自然而然地根据周围的土地利用方式来调整自己的偏好，并继续自己的易行旅行行为。因此，确定不协调的群体以指导政策制定以减少TOD中的不协调程度至关重要。这项研究确定了在布里斯班的TOD /非TOD地区更可能引起不满的群体。根据对已建环境因素的聚类分析，将6271个人的生活条件分为TOD类型或非TOD类型。基于对旅行态度和偏好的因素分析，个人的偏爱社区也分为TOD和非TOD类型。当受访者的实际和偏爱的邻里类型相结合时，确定了四个独特的群体（TOD和非TOD区域中的辅音和辅音）。采用二元逻辑回归分析来确定TOD /非TOD地区居民不和谐的决定因素。结果表明，居住在TOD地区的受访者中有30％是反对者。在布里斯班TOD地区，男性，一直有汽车可用和/或健康状况较差的个人更有可能成为不和谐的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号