首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sustainable transportation >A Comparison of Three Methods for Identifying Transport-Based Exclusion: A Case Study of Children's Access to Urban Opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York
【24h】

A Comparison of Three Methods for Identifying Transport-Based Exclusion: A Case Study of Children's Access to Urban Opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York

机译:三种识别基于交通的排斥的方法的比较:以纽约伊利和尼亚加拉县儿童获得城市机会的机会为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Achieving transport sustainability is contingent on many factors, including transportation services being provided equitably regardless of race, income, gender, disability, and/or any other differentiating characteristics. A major risk of inequitable service provision is that without sufficient accessibility via transport, populations are put at a disadvantage, which may result in conditions of exclusion. At the present time, however, the dimensions of transport-based social exclusion are not fully understood, and the elusive nature of the concept renders it difficult to quantify. In this paper, three methods for identifying transport-excluded populations are examined and compared. The first follows a traditional approach to identifying disadvantaged groups by means of an inequality index based on deprivation. The other two techniques are accessibility-based, and work with a detailed travel diary data set. The study is conducted in the counties of Erie and Niagara, New York, and the population examined is composed of children between the ages of 5 and 18 years old. The results reveal how the models differentially identify excluded populations and should inform planners and practitioners of the implications for choosing between these different approaches.
机译:实现运输的可持续性取决于许多因素,包括公平地提供运输服务,而与种族,收入,性别,残疾和/或任何其他差异化特征无关。提供服务不均的主要风险是,如果没有足够的交通运输手段,人口将处于不利境地,这可能会导致被排斥的情况。但是,目前,对于基于交通的社会排斥的维度尚不完全了解,并且该概念的难以捉摸的性质使其难以量化。本文研究并比较了三种识别被排除在外的人口的方法。第一类遵循传统方法,即通过基于剥夺的不平等指数来识别弱势群体。其他两种技术是基于可访问性的,并且可以使用详细的旅行日记数据集。该研究是在纽约伊利和尼亚加拉县进行的,所调查的人群由5至18岁的儿童组成。结果揭示了模型如何区别地识别被排除的人群,并应告知规划者和从业者在这些不同方法之间进行选择的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号