• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of synthetic emotions >Epistemology and Emotions
【24h】

Epistemology and Emotions

机译：认识论与情感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Philosophy and Emotions have been historically confronted, at least for Western thinkers, the only ones taken into account in this culturally biased book (what about the Nyaya-Vaisesika, Samkhya-Yoga, Vedanta or Buddhist accounts of emotions?). Trying to be more precise, emotions were historically considered superfluous and dangerous for the superior rational thinking and, consequently, they were banned from any epistemological project. Brun, Doguoglu and Kuenzle have edited a book on the new perspectives that try to merge emotions and epistemology. The list of contributors is authoritative but at the same time not monotonous: there is a debate among authors. Catherine Z. Elgin, Christopher Hookway, Alessandra Tanesini, Sabine Doering, Daniel Dohrn, Markis Wild, Paul Thagard and Ronald de Sousa explain their own ideas about how emotions and rationality are intrinsically entangled in order to produce (good?)knowledge. I'll describe the main ideas present in the book and will only make special reference to its origin if the author makes a special contribution to the debate.
机译：历史上一直面对着哲学和情感，至少对于西方思想家来说，这本有文化偏见的书中只考虑了哲学和情感（Nyaya-Vaisesika，Samkhya-Yoga，Vedanta或佛教对情感的描述是什么？）。为了更加精确，从历史上讲，情感被认为对于高级理性思考来说是多余的和危险的，因此，它们被禁止用于任何认识论项目。 Brun，Doguoglu和Kuenzle编辑了一本书，探讨了试图将情感和认识论融为一体的新观点。贡献者名单是权威性的，但同时也不单调：作者之间存在争论。 Catherine Z.Elgin，Christopher Hookway，Alessandra Tanesini，Sabine Doering，Daniel Dohrn，Markis Wild，Paul Thagard和Ronald de Sousa解释了他们自己关于如何纠缠情绪和理性以产生（良好？）知识的想法。我将描述书中提出的主要思想，并且仅在作者为辩论做出特殊贡献时才特别提及其起源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号