...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of systematic theology >A Compelling Trinitarian Taxonomy: Hans Urs von Balthasar's Theology of the Trinitarian Inversion and Reversion
【24h】

A Compelling Trinitarian Taxonomy: Hans Urs von Balthasar's Theology of the Trinitarian Inversion and Reversion

机译：引人注目的三位一体分类法：汉斯·乌尔斯·冯·巴尔塔萨尔的三位一体倒立与倒退神学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In trinitarian theology, the problematic place of the Holy Spirit in the taxonomy of the immanent Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) does not seem to correspond to what is revealed in the economy (Father, Holy Spirit and Son). Because of this pneumatological problem, some theologians have abandoned the traditional trinitarian taxonomy. This approach, however, does not provide a finally convincing answer that is consistent with both the biblical witness and the theological tradition. In this article, I argue that Hans Urs von Balthasar's theology of the trinitarian inversion and reversion does provide a convincing answer to the trinitarian taxonomy problem. After supporting my thesis by first referencing the traditional trinitarian taxonomy offered in Augustine's de Trinitate and then examining the possibility of abandoning the taxonomy given by Jtirgen Moltmann and Leonardo Boff, I will offer von Balthasar's solution as the most compelling trinitarian taxonomy, especially in light of the ecumenical dialogue between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
机译：在三位一体的神学中，圣灵在固有的三位一体（父亲，儿子和圣灵）的分类法中的问题地位似乎与经济中所揭示的（父亲，圣灵和儿子）的情况不符。由于这个气动问题，一些神学家放弃了传统的三位一体分类法。但是，这种方法并没有提供与圣经见证人和神学传统相一致的最终令人信服的答案。在本文中，我认为汉斯·乌尔斯·冯·巴尔塔萨尔（Hans Urs von Balthasar）的三位一体颠倒和反转神学确实为三位一体的分类学问题提供了令人信服的答案。在首先参考奥古斯丁的《三位一体》中提供的传统三位一体分类法，然后研究了放弃Jtirgen Moltmann和Leonardo Boff给出的分类学的可能性后，我将提供von Balthasar的解决方案，这是最引人注目的三位一体分类法。罗马天主教和东正教教堂之间的普世对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号