...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of water resources development >What Are the Economic Health Costs of Non-action in Controlling Toxic Water Pollution?
【24h】

What Are the Economic Health Costs of Non-action in Controlling Toxic Water Pollution?

机译：不采取任何行动控制有毒水污染的经济健康成本是多少？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper identifies information that may be important in determining the benefits of preventing toxic water contamination (or equivalent cost of non-action) when a given toxification occurs. It attempts to identify information and behaviour issues that need to be considered when benefits are estimated and weighed against the costs of removing toxins. This paper also provides 'scenarios' for three toxic pollutants that are found in water bodies. The paper makes use of two alternatives, one for developing countries and the other for developed countries, to demonstrate, with specific examples of arsenic, mercury and atrazine, how benefit estimates and control policies vary with different assumptions concerning behaviour/information and type of chemical contamination.
机译：本文确定了对于确定在发生给定的毒害时防止有毒水污染（或等效的非作用成本）的益处可能很重要的信息。它试图确定在估计收益并权衡去除毒素的成本时需要考虑的信息和行为问题。本文还提供了在水体中发现的三种有毒污染物的“方案”。该文件利用了两种选择，一种是针对发展中国家的，另一种是针对发达国家的，以砷，汞和at去津的具体实例来说明，在关于行为/信息和化学品类型的不同假设下，收益估算和控制政策是如何变化的污染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号