...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Water >Decentralised drinking water regulation: risks, benefits and the hunt for equality in the Canadian context
【24h】

Decentralised drinking water regulation: risks, benefits and the hunt for equality in the Canadian context

机译：分散式饮用水监管：在加拿大背景下的风险，收益和寻求平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Drinking water management in Canada is based on the intervention of provinces and territories. This contrasts with the American and European approach of uniform, legally enforced regulation at the federal or super-federal level. The Canadian model has been widely criticised for the unequal level of regulation between provinces and territories and the passive role taken by the federal government. This paper: 1) puts calls for greater centralisation in the context of Canada's social and political climate; 2) reviews government, academic and environmental advocacy literature on competing drinking water regulation paradigms; 3) evaluates strengths and weaknesses of centralised and decentralised frameworks for drinking water regulation in the context of risk management theory and practical challenges. Notably, we evaluate drinking water decision-making as one of many competing opportunities for public spending on risk abatement and posit that increasing the uniformity of drinking water quality does not necessarily increase overall equality.
机译：加拿大的饮用水管理基于各省和地区的干预。这与美国和欧洲在联邦或超级联邦一级采用统一的法律强制性法规的做法形成鲜明对比。加拿大模式因各省和地区之间不平等的监管水平以及联邦政府的被动作用而受到广泛批评。本文：1）呼吁在加拿大的社会和政治环境下进行更大程度的集权； 2）回顾有关竞争性饮用水法规范式的政府，学术和环境倡导文献； 3）在风险管理理论和实际挑战的背景下，评估饮用水监管的集中和分散框架的优缺点。值得注意的是，我们将饮用水决策作为公共机构在降低风险方面的公共支出的众多竞争机会之一，并认为提高饮用水水质的均匀性并不一定会提高整体平等程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号