• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie >‘All together now!’ Couples and the ontological problem of cohabitation as a form of life
【24h】

‘All together now!’ Couples and the ontological problem of cohabitation as a form of life

机译：“现在在一起！”夫妻和同居作为一种生活形式的本体论问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this essay is that of analysing cohabitation as a form of life, according to its ontological status. This way of investigating leads to a comparison with marriage as a specific institution and with the conversation rules between partners. From the empirical analysis of more than 50 interviews with cohabitating couples comes the idea of a relationship whose intent is reciprocal care and assistance in everyday life. In other words, cohabitation is not a mere refusal of marriage as an institution, in the perspective of the interviewed, but seems to represent the lifestyle that best expresses the political ideal of a liberal-democratic society based on conversation between free and consenting individuals. At first glance cohabitation shows an ontological status of its own, a sort of ‘marriage conversation’. Yet, deploying a deeper way of analysis and following a critical realist and relational epistemology, one can notice that such status is influenced by an abstract expansion of the present as the only possible dimension for the couple. As soon as one thinks about shared future plans, the implied call of a married perfection of one's life experience strikes back, revealing the existence of a hidden rule towards marriage as a form of life. The importance of cohabitation is now conceived as the relevance of contingency and unselected opportunities. This fact reveals the limits of the individualized perspective influencing the everyday life of cohabiting couples. Doubts on ontological independence of cohabitation are still many, with its constant and ambivalent reference to the marriage dimension.View full textDownload full textKeywordscohabitation, conversation, ontology, couple, marriageRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625665
机译：本文的目的是根据同居作为一种生命形式，根据其本体论状态来分析。通过这种调查方式，可以将婚姻作为一个特定机构与伴侣之间的对话规则进行比较。通过对同居伴侣进行的50多次访谈的实证分析，得出了一种关系的想法，其意图是在日常生活中互惠互助。换句话说，从受访者的角度来看，同居不仅是作为制度的婚姻的拒绝，而且似乎代表了一种生活方式，该生活方式最能体现自由民主社会的政治理想，这种自由是建立在自由个体与同意个体之间的对话基础上的。乍看之下，同居显示出其自身的本体论状态，即一种“婚姻对话”。然而，采用一种更深层的分析方法并遵循一种批判的现实主义和关系认识论，人们可以注意到，这种状态受到当前抽象扩展的影响，这是夫妻俩唯一可能的维度。只要一想到共享的未来计划，就暗示婚姻已完美地实现了自己的生活经验，这暗示着存在着将婚姻作为一种生活形式的潜规则。现在，同居的重要性被认为是偶然性和未被选择的机会的相关性。这个事实揭示了影响同居伴侣日常生活的个体化视角的局限性。关于同居的本体论独立性的疑问仍然很多，其关于婚姻维度的含义是恒定和矛盾的。查看全文下载全文citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625665

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号