...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Internet Computing, IEEE >Bye-Bye Agents? Not
【24h】

Bye-Bye Agents? Not

机译：再见代理商？不

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Is Carl Hewitt a good prophet in predicting a "Perfect Disruption: Causing the Paradigm Shift from Mental Agents to ORGs?" The author states that the agents paradigm isn't a crisis yet and could play a more aggressive role not only in AI but in several sciences. He disagree that organizations of restricted generality (ORGs) are really an alternative to agents because they conceptually and computationally presuppose agents. In this paper, the author propose that the agent community should create a new initiative to define the various forms of agent technologies. It should be as inclusive as possible, but unless some technologies are excluded, nothing will have been defined. There should be a broad definition that represents the technologies that are included, and it should have some scientific value. People don't want to be in the business of defining "planet" or "agent." People do have to be in the business of better defining what it is we do, how it's different, and showing that it matters. Unless we do a better job of defining our scientific contributions, agents will unfortunately continue to be sidelined as a legitimate scientific endeavor and community.
机译：卡尔·休伊特（Carl Hewitt）是一位很好的预言家，他预言了“完美的颠覆：导致从精神行为者到ORG的范式转变？”作者指出，代理范式还不是一个危机，它不仅可以在AI中而且可以在几门科学中扮演更加积极的角色。他不同意限制性通用组织（ORG）实际上是代理的替代方案，因为它们在概念和计算上都以代理为前提。在本文中，作者建议代理社区应该创建一个新的倡议来定义各种形式的代理技术。它应该尽可能地包含所有内容，但是除非排除某些技术，否则什么都没有定义。应该有一个代表所包含技术的广义定义，并且应该具有一定的科学价值。人们不想从事定义“行星”或“代理人”的工作。人们确实必须更好地定义我们所做的事情，它与众不同之处，并证明它很重要。除非我们在定义科学贡献方面做得更好，否则不幸的是，代理商将继续被视为合法的科学努力和社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号