...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Studies >Writing Back? Jalal Al-e Ahmad's (1923-69) Reflections on Selected Periods of Iranian History 1
【24h】

Writing Back? Jalal Al-e Ahmad's (1923-69) Reflections on Selected Periods of Iranian History 1

机译：写回？贾拉勒·艾哈迈德（Jalal Al-e Ahmad）（1923-69）对伊朗历史某些时期的反思1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As a collectively acting subject, the Pahlavi regime constituted itself through a functional memory by construing a particular past. In this way, the official or political memory served as the regime's key legitimizing factor. Both Pahlavi shahs attempted to appropriate the Iranian past as well as its future; that is, they legitimized their rule in retrospect and sought to immortalize themselves prospectively. In contrast to the official historiography, 'counter-memories' are often established. The motive in producing such a 'counter-memory,' whose founders are usually the conquered and oppressed, is to delegitimize the perceived oppressive balance of power. An outspoken critic of the Pahlavi regime, the Iranian teacher and writer Jalal Al-e Ahmad 'wrote back,' trying his hand at a 'counter memory'.
机译：作为集体行动的主体，巴列维政权通过解释特定的过去，通过职能记忆来构成自己。这样，官方或政治记忆成为该政权的关键合法化因素。帕拉维·沙阿（Pahlavi Shah）都试图兼顾伊朗的过去和未来。也就是说，他们回顾了自己的统治合法化，并试图使自己永生。与官方史学相比，“反记忆”通常被建立。产生这样一种“反记忆”的动机是使人们认为的压制的力量平衡合法化，这种反记忆的创始人通常被征服和压迫。一位对巴列维政权直言不讳的批评家，伊朗老师和作家贾拉勒·艾哈迈德（Jalal Al-e Ahmad）“写信回去”，试图在“反记忆”中动手。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Iranian Studies》 |2007年第5期|559-578|共20页
  • 作者

    Anja Pistor-Hatam;

  • 作者单位

    Christian-Albrechts-Universitt, Kiel;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号