...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Israel Affairs >From Durban to the Goldstone Report: the centrality of human rights NGOs in the political dimension of the Arab-Israeli conflict
【24h】

From Durban to the Goldstone Report: the centrality of human rights NGOs in the political dimension of the Arab-Israeli conflict

机译：从德班到戈德斯通报告：人权非政府组织在阿以冲突的政治层面上的核心地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Disproportionate and unsubstantiated allegations of human rights violations, war crimes and racism have been employed as a form of political warfare designed to isolate Israel internationally. This strategy, based on the model used to defeat the apartheid government in South Africa, was adopted in 2001 at the NGO Forum of the UN-sponsored Durban Conference on racism, in which 1500 organizations participated. Since then, as demonstrated in this article, many human rights NGOs have consistently supported the political agenda of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), whose members dominate the UN Human Rights Council. In the decade following the Durban conference, the NGO network has issued frequent condemnations of Israel based on false or unverifiable allegations of human rights abuses and ‘war crimes’. The NGO campaigns, led by international groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, are central in this process, from Jenin (2002), through the UNHRC's Goldstone Report on the Gaza war (2009). Journalists, academics, diplomats, political leaders, and legal officials in liberal Western democracies frequently cite these generally unsubstantiated allegations in condemning Israeli policies, reflecting the ‘soft power’ of these NGOs acting to reinforce the Palestinian narrative and the objectives of the OIC.View full textDownload full textKeywordsIsrael, NGOs, Goldstone Report, Durban, de-legitimization, TutuRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2012.689518
机译：关于侵犯人权，战争罪行和种族主义的指控不成比例且没有根据，已被用作旨在在国际上孤立以色列的政治战争形式。该战略基于打败南非种族隔离政府的模式，于2001年在联合国主办的德班种族主义会议的非政府组织论坛上通过，有1500个组织参加。此后，如本文所述，许多人权非政府组织一直支持伊斯兰会议组织（OIC）的政治议程，该组织的成员主导着联合国人权理事会。在德班会议之后的十年中，非政府组织网络基于对人权侵犯和“战争罪”的虚假或无法核实的指控而频繁地谴责以色列。由人权观察组织和国际特赦组织等国际组织牵头的非政府组织运动在此过程中至关重要，从杰宁（2002年）到联合国人权事务高级专员关于加沙战争的戈德斯通报告（2009年）。西方自由民主国家的记者，学者，外交官，政治领导人和法律官员经常在谴责以色列政策时援引这些普遍缺乏根据的指控，反映出这些非政府组织“软实力”的作用是强化巴勒斯坦的叙事以及巴勒斯坦民族的目标。 OIC.View全文下载全文关键字：以色列，非政府组织，金石报告，德班，反合法化，Tutu stumbleupon，digg，google，more“，pubid：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2012.689518

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号