...
首页> 外文期刊>Jane's Defence Weekly >Predicting the Arab Spring: what we got wrong
【24h】

Predicting the Arab Spring: what we got wrong

机译:预测阿拉伯之春:我们错了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In late 2010 all looked quiet on the Arab front: authoritarian regimes, established for decades, ruled most of the 22 member states of the Arab League and, while poverty and employment rates were high, they had been so for longer than one cared to remember. Foreign Policy magazine's 'Failed State Index', published in June 2010 - which categorises countries into one of five states: critical, in danger, borderline, stable and most stable - did not see any of the Arab states as 'in danger' and, to be fair, neither did most analysts working on the region. What followed - the fall of three dictators, mass demonstrations and a war against Libya - stunned most of all the very people who had studied the region for so long. The question thus remains: why did we fail to predict the Arab Spring?
机译:在2010年底,阿拉伯国家的局势看起来一片平静:建立了数十年的威权政权统治着阿拉伯联盟的22个成员国中的大多数,尽管贫困和就业率很高,但它们的存在时间已经超过一个人需要记住的时间。 《外交政策》杂志于2010年6月发布的“失败国家指数”将国家划分为五个州之一:危急,处于危险,边界,稳定和最稳定的州之一,但没有一个阿拉伯国家被视为处于“危险”状态,并且公平地说,大多数分析家都没有在该地区开展工作。随后发生的三位独裁者垮台,大规模游行示威以及与利比亚的战争使所有研究该地区很长时间的人大为震惊。因此,问题仍然存在:为什么我们无法预测阿拉伯之春?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号