...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Jane's Defence Weekly >Soldiers, Inc.
【24h】

Soldiers, Inc.

机译：士兵公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office on 12 February issued a long-awaited Green Paper entitled "Private Military Companies -Options for Regulation". The study was undertaken in response to a request from the House of Commons Select Committee for Foreign Affairs to investigate how private military companies (PMCs) operating from the UK might be regulated. The Green Paper has come in the wake of the 1998 'Arms-to-Africa' affair in which the UK government was implicated. Sierra Leone was under a UN arms embargo, which the PMC Sandline was alleged to have broken by providing forces of the exiled government with 28 tons of small arms from Bulgaria. The UK government fell under suspicion when it was alleged that the British High Commissioner to Sierra Leone had supported the aid. This led to a wider investigation of governments' use of PMCs and an effort, at least in the UK, to try to modernise the regulation of these types of organisations. When the private sector wants to sell military skills, alarm bells always start to ring. The activities of PMCs during the civil war in Sierra Leone fully illustrate the pros and cons of employing privatised military organisations in areas of conflict.
机译：英国外交和联邦事务部于2月12日发布了期待已久的绿皮书，题为“私营军事公司-监管选择”。这项研究是应众议院外交事务特别委员会的要求而进行的，该委员会调查如何对在英国运营的私营军事公司（PMC）进行监管。绿皮书是在1998年“涉军非洲”事件之后提出的，英国政府对此事有牵连。塞拉利昂处于联合国武器禁运之下，据称PMC Sandline通过向流亡政府部队提供来自保加利亚的28吨小武器而打破了这一禁令。当据称英国驻塞拉利昂高级专员支持该援助时，英国政府对此表示怀疑。这导致对政府对PMC的使用进行了更广泛的调查，并且至少在英国试图对这些类型的组织的监管进行现代化。当私营部门想出售军事技能时，警钟总是响起。 PMC在塞拉利昂内战期间的活动充分说明了在冲突地区雇用私有化军事组织的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号