• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Inconsistent Responses to Notifications of Suspected Plagiarism in Finnish Higher Education
【24h】

Inconsistent Responses to Notifications of Suspected Plagiarism in Finnish Higher Education

机译：对芬兰高等教育疑似抄袭的通知不一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

All higher education institutions in Finland are committed to following the guidelines of good scientific practice and procedures to handle allegations of misconduct compiled by the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. However, there is no research available in what way institutions follow these guidelines. This article analyses the current practices of defining and dealing with plagiarism in published Master's theses. The data consist of 29 written notifications of suspected plagiarism in Master's theses that were sent to the rectors of universities and decisions on these 29 cases. Inductive content analysis was used to classify the decisions according to definitions of plagiarism, processes to deal with suspicions and sanctions for plagiarism. Due to inconsistency and perplexity in some of the decisions, classifications are overlapping. The main actor in the process is the rector of the higher education institution who bases the decision on the views of preliminary enquirer. Preliminary inquiry has replaced investigation proper and this allows the procedures to remain internal and local. There is no consensus of the definition of plagiarism, and the sanctions for plagiarism vary from nothing to an attempt to revoke a Master's degree. The adherence of the higher education institutions to the national ethical guidelines is not optimal and leads to inconsistent responses to notifications of suspected plagiarism.
机译：芬兰的所有高等教育机构都致力于遵循良好的科学实践和程序指导，以处理芬兰咨询委员会关于研究完整性编制的不当行为的指控。但是，没有任何研究，其中机构遵循这些指导方针。本文分析了当前在公布的硕士论文中定义和处理抄袭的现行做法。该数据由29个涉嫌抄袭的书面通知组成，硕士学位在大学和决策中送到了大学和决定。归纳内容分析用于根据抄袭的定义，处理怀疑和对抄袭制裁的过程来分类决策。由于某些决定中的不一致性和困惑，分类是重叠的。该过程中的主要演员是高等教育机构的校长，他们基于关于初步询问者的意见的决定。初步调查已更换调查适当，这使得程序仍然是内部和本地。抄袭定义没有共识，抄袭的制裁因企图撤销硕士学位而异。高等教育机构对民族道德准则的依从性并不是最佳的，并导致涉嫌抄袭通知的反应不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号