• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Adult Development >Care and Justice in Real-Life Moral Reasoning
【24h】

Care and Justice in Real-Life Moral Reasoning

机译：现实生活中道德推理中的关怀与正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Moral reasoning of 57 (Time 1) and 59 (Time 2) nursing, social-work and law-enforcement students was investigated in terms of care and justice reasoning about hypothetical and real-life dilemmas. The analysis methods were the Ethic of Care Interview, the Moral Judgment Interview, Lyons' Moral Orientation Scheme and Wark and Krebs' classification of real-life dilemmas. The type of dilemma predicted moral orientation usage. Prosocial dilemmas pulled for care and antisocial dilemmas for justice orientation. Level of justice reasoning varied according to the type of dilemma. Real-life care reasoning was consistent with participants' competence, with the exception of transgression-type dilemmas at Time 2. Levels of care and justice reasoning were highly correlated with each other. These results underscore the importance of the dilemma type and suggest that care reasoning is a significant part of real life morality. The study recommends the ECI as a new model to account for real-life care reasoning.
机译：从关于假设和现实困境的护理和正义推理方面，对57名（时间1）和59（时间2）护理，社会工作和执法学生的道德推理进行了调查。分析方法包括护理伦理访谈，道德判断访谈，里昂的道德取向方案以及沃克和克雷布斯对现实困境的分类。困境的类型预测道德取向的用法。亲社会的困境为照顾而拉，反社会的困境为正义而拉。正义推理的水平根据困境的类型而变化。现实生活中的护理推理与参与者的能力是一致的，除了在时间2的过犯型困境。护理和司法推理的水平彼此高度相关。这些结果强调了困境类型的重要性，并表明护理推理是现实生活道德的重要组成部分。该研究建议将ECI作为一种新模型来说明现实生活中的护理推理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号