首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >PILOTS OUT OF UNIFORM: HOW THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S ETIHAD DECISION UNDERMINES THE PURPOSE OF THE MONTREAL CONVENTION
【24h】

PILOTS OUT OF UNIFORM: HOW THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S ETIHAD DECISION UNDERMINES THE PURPOSE OF THE MONTREAL CONVENTION

机译:飞行员表现出不同寻常:第六次电路的决定如何破坏《蒙特利尔公约》的宗旨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IN DOE V. ETIHAD AIRWAYS, P.J.S.C., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rewrote the test for mental anguish under the Montreal Convention to allow recovery with any physical injury,-disregarding years of precedent establishing a universal interpretation that mental anguish must "flow from" a physical injury to be recoverable. Although the Sixth Circuit properly found that, on the facts of the case before it, the plaintiff could state a claim for mental anguish, the court unnecessarily rewrote an established test. In doing so, the court violated the presumption in favor of uniformity, impermissibly disregarded the interpretation of the United States' co-signatory nations, and failed to account for the very purpose of the Montreal Convention-to bring the law of various nations into uniformity. Although the Supreme Court has already declined to grant certiorari, it should take the next possible opportunity to clarify the law and hold that the traditional interpretation is correct.
机译:美国司法部第六巡回上诉法院在DOE V.ETIHAD AIRWAYS中重写了《蒙特利尔公约》所规定的精神痛苦测试,以使任何人身伤亡得以恢复,而无视多年确立精神痛苦必须得到普遍解释的先例。从身体伤害中“流出”是可以恢复的。尽管第六巡回法院根据原案事实适当地发现,原告可以提出精神痛苦的主张,但法院不必要地重写了既定的标准。这样做,法院违反了赞成统一的推定,无视了美国共同签署国的解释,并且没有考虑到《蒙特利尔公约》的真正目的-使各国法律统一。尽管最高法院已经拒绝授予证明书,但应该利用下一个可能的机会来澄清法律并认为传统解释是正确的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Air Law and Commerce》 |2019年第1期|153-161|共9页
  • 作者

    J. Collin Spring;

  • 作者单位

    SMU Dedman School of Law Candidate for Juris Doctor (May 2020);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号