...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >DISASSEMBLING ASSEMBLER LIABILITY: ARE OEMS STRICTLY LIABLE FOR PMA PARTS IN AVIATION CASES?
【24h】

DISASSEMBLING ASSEMBLER LIABILITY: ARE OEMS STRICTLY LIABLE FOR PMA PARTS IN AVIATION CASES?

机译：拆卸组装者责任：OEM是否对航空案件中的PMA零件承担严格责任？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

"Strict liability is a harsh rule and should be applied only in very limited situations."127 While policy considerations may support placing the risk of harm caused by a defective product on its manufacturer through the imposition of strict liability, those same considerations counsel against extending such liability to OEMs for PMA parts that the OEM did not produce or sell. Regardless of the FAA's regulatory regime, an OEM that does not profit from the sale of a PMA component part and has no direct or otherwise meaningful control over the design or manufacturing processes involved in making the part should not be subject to strict liability for injuries arising from a defect in the part. Put simply, an OEM of an aviation product should have no greater risk of strict liability than any other product manufacturer.
机译：“严格责任是严格的规定，应仅在非常有限的情况下适用。” 127虽然政策考虑可能支持通过施加严格责任来将缺陷产品造成的损害风险置于其制造商身上，但同样的考虑也建议不要延长原始设备制造商未生产或销售的PMA零件对原始设备制造商的责任。无论FAA的监管制度如何，不能从销售PMA零部件中获利并且对制造该零部件所涉及的设计或制造过程没有直接或其他有意义的控制的OEM不应对由此引起的伤害承担严格责任。来自零件的缺陷。简而言之，航空产品的原始设备制造商应没有任何其他产品制造商承担严格责任的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号