• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION INITIATIVES VERSUS INDUSTRY INITIATIVES: A LOOK AT HOW COMMERCIALLY MOTIVATED TRANSACTIONS INCREASE AVIATION SAFETY
【24h】

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION INITIATIVES VERSUS INDUSTRY INITIATIVES: A LOOK AT HOW COMMERCIALLY MOTIVATED TRANSACTIONS INCREASE AVIATION SAFETY

机译：国际民用航空组织倡议与行业倡议：看商业化交易如何提高航空安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The ratification of the Cape Town Convention helped establish that industry initiative is better at promoting aviation safety than ICAO. The Cape Town Convention uses socio-economic measures of aircraft leasing to fill safety gaps, especially in developing nations. Also, aircraft leasing measures under the Cape Town Convention help aircraft manufacturers keep up with the demand for aircraft. Because the Convention provides actual ways to address commercial needs within the aviation industry while promoting safer air travel, it was able to collect support from all types of players in the international aviation community. The lack of support for the Unlawful Interference Compensation Convention and General Risks Convention illustrates ICAO's misplaced focus on developing international treaties that are not commercially motivated and are insufficient at filling safety gaps within the aviation industry. ICAO should focus on developing programs that advance industry initiatives, therefore helping to decrease the amount of aviation safety gaps. Overall, ICAO and the industry should work together on commercially motivated international agreements and standards to promote a safer aviation environment.
机译：批准《开普敦公约》有助于确立行业倡议比国际民航组织更好地促进航空安全。 《开普敦公约》使用飞机租赁的社会经济措施来填补安全空白，尤其是在发展中国家。此外，《开普敦公约》规定的飞机租赁措施有助于飞机制造商跟上飞机需求。因为《公约》提供了解决航空业商业需求的实际方法，同时又促进了更安全的航空旅行，所以它能够从国际航空界的所有参与者中获得支持。缺乏对《非法干扰赔偿公约》和《一般风险公约》的支持，说明了国际民航组织错误地将重点放在了发展没有商业动机且不足以填补航空业安全空白的国际条约上。国际民航组织应集中精力制定促进行业举措的计划，从而帮助减少航空安全差距。总体而言，国际民航组织和航空业应在商业动机的国际协议和标准上共同努力，以促进更安全的航空环境。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Air Law and Commerce》 |2016年第4期|683-706|共24页
  • 作者

    Jennifer Ann Urban;

  • 作者单位

    Transportation & Trade Group at Cozen O'Connor, based in the Washington, D.C;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号