• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >CAN WE ADDRESS ORBITAL DEBRIS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LAW WE ALREADY HAVE? AN EXAMINATION OF TREATY INTERPRETATION AND THE DUE REGARD PRINCIPLE
【24h】

CAN WE ADDRESS ORBITAL DEBRIS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LAW WE ALREADY HAVE? AN EXAMINATION OF TREATY INTERPRETATION AND THE DUE REGARD PRINCIPLE

机译：我们可以通过我们已经拥有的国际法解决轨道碎片吗？审查条约解释和适当的原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

India's controversial anti-satellite test in 2019 provides the United States an opportunity to demonstrate leadership in preventing future debris-generating events. However, new international space laws or norms are unlikely. Instead, the United States could look to the international space law already in place, particularly the due regard principle contained within Article IX of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (Article IX). Ignored throughout its history, Article IX's due regard principle has untapped potential. States, through their practice in the application of treaties, can shape the interpretation of treaty provisions in order to accommodate changing circumstances. The United States has experience in applying this approach to the space domain, having established practices to shape interpretations of the legal concepts of peaceful purposes and non-appropriation. If the United States seeks to lead an international effort to address the threat of orbital debris, then the due regard principle presents a possible tool well worth considering. This Article examines the potential of the due regard principle, the possibility of establishing a functional meaning, and some considerations involved in pursuing such a course of action.
机译：2019年印度有争议的抗卫星测试为美国提供了展示在防止未来碎片生成事件方面的领导的机会。但是，新的国际空间法或规范不太可能。相反，美国可以展望已经到位的国际空间法，特别是在1967年外层空间条约（第IX条）的第九条中包含的适当关系原则。在整个历史中忽略，第九条的适当关系原则尚未开发出来。通过其在申请条约的实践中，可以塑造条约规定的解释，以适应不断变化的情况。美国有经验在将这种方法应用于空间领域，并制定了塑造了对和平目的法律概念和不拨款的法律概念的解释。如果美国旨在领导国际努力解决轨道碎片的威胁，那么适当的原则呈现出一个可能考虑的工具。本文审查了适当考虑原则，建立功能意义的可能性以及参与追求此类行动方案的一些考虑因素的潜力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Air Law and Commerce》 |2020年第2期|309-337|共29页
  • 作者

    John S. Goehring;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University Institute of Air and Space Law University of California Berkeley Tulane Law School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号