• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >ENDING THE FOREVER WAR: RESOLVING THE BOEING-AIRBUS TRADE DISPUTE WITH A NEW BILATERAL AGREEMENT
【24h】

ENDING THE FOREVER WAR: RESOLVING THE BOEING-AIRBUS TRADE DISPUTE WITH A NEW BILATERAL AGREEMENT

机译：结束永远的战争：解决与新的双边协定的波音空中客车贸易纠纷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In today's ever-connected and increasingly global economy, there is a strong need for cooperation in bilateral and multilateral trade exchanges, but international trade disputes have arisen in the context of many industries, goods, and services. Over the last two decades, the European Union (EU) and the United States have been embroiled in a complicated dispute over subsidies given to their largest commercial airline manufacturers, a practice that both governments have engaged in heavily. Increased global reliance on air travel, coupled with the dominance of few companies worldwide, has raised the stakes for maintaining innovation and profitability. Both the EU and the United States have each sought to protect their largest aircraft manufacturers with favorable government grants while at the same time condemning the other's use of the same tactics. These subsidies on both sides of the Atlantic have been the subject of dueling complaints at the World Trade Organization (WTO) that have recently come to a head. The WTO has found that both the EU and the United States are in violation of a 1992 agreement that prohibits the use of subsidies in the aircraft manufacturing industry, findings that have paved the way for both the EU and the United States to retaliate against each other using tariffs. This Comment seeks to explore a solution to this dispute by suggesting a new bilateral trade agreement between the two governments. The devastating effects of prolonging the dispute even more, compounded by the already heightened tensions between the two governments on the world stage, underscore the urgency of coming to a new bilateral agreement specific to civilian aircraft. Because it is unlikely that the EU and the United States will actually abandon the practice of subsidizing their respective aircraft manufacturers-especially in a time of uncertainty and turmoil in the large civilian aircraft industry-it is important that the two governments clearly define what will be acceptable moving forward and agree to adhere to such terms.
机译：在今天的无与伦比和日益全球经济中，有强烈需要在双边和多边贸易交流中合作，但国际贸易纠纷在许多行业，商品和服务的背景下出现。在过去的二十年中，欧洲联盟（欧盟）和美国已被禁止在对其最大的商业航空公司制造商的补贴的复杂争议中，这两国政府都在庞大。全球依赖航空旅行，加上全球少数公司的主导地位，提出了维持创新和盈利的股份。欧盟和美国都试图保护他们最大的飞机制造商以有利的政府拨款，同时同时谴责对方的使用相同的策略。大西洋双方的这些补贴一直是在世界贸易组织（WTO）的决斗投诉的主题，该组织最近是掌握的。世贸组织发现，欧盟和美国都违反了1992年的协议，禁止在飞机制造业中使用补贴，为欧盟和美国铺平了道路的调查结果，以互相报复使用关税。该评论旨在通过建议两国政府之间的新双边贸易协议来探讨这一纠纷的解决方案。延长争议的毁灭性效果甚至更多，在世界舞台上的两国政府之间的已经提高的紧张局势复杂化，强调了对特定于民用飞机的新双边协议的紧迫性。因为欧盟和美国不太可能会放弃补贴各自航空器制造商的做法 - 特别是在大平民行业的不确定和动荡的时候 - 这两届政府明确定义了什么可以接受前进并同意遵守这些条款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号