• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied measurement >Examining Rater Judgements in Music Performance Assessment using Many-Facets Rasch Rating Scale Measurement Model
【24h】

Examining Rater Judgements in Music Performance Assessment using Many-Facets Rasch Rating Scale Measurement Model

机译：使用许多方面Rasch评级尺度测量模型检查音乐性能评估中的Rater判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The fairness of raters in music performance assessment has become an important concern in the field of music. The assessment of students' music performance depends in a fundamental way on rater judgements. The quality of rater judgements is crucial to provide fair, meaningful and informative assessments of music performance. There are many external factors that can influence the quality of rater judgements. Previous research has used different measurement models to examine the quality of rater judgements (e.g., generalizability theory). There are limitations with the previous analysis methods that are based on classical test theory and its extensions. In this study, we use modern measurement theory (Rasch measurement theory) to examine the quality of rater judgements. The many-facets Rasch rating scale model is employed to investigate the extent of rater-invariant measurement in the context of music performance assessments related to university degrees in Malaysia (159 students rated by 24 raters). We examine the rating scale structure, the severity levels of the raters, and the judged difficulty of the items. We also examine the interaction effects across musical instrument subgroups (keyboard, strings, woodwinds, brass, percussions and vocal). The results suggest that there were differences in severity levels among the raters. The results of this study also suggest that raters had different severity levels when rating different musical instrument subgroups. The implications for research, theory and practice in the assessment of music performance are included in this paper.
机译：音乐绩效评估中的评估者的公平性已经成为音乐领域的重要关注。对学生的音乐表现的评估依赖于评价判决的基本途径。评价判决的质量至关重要，为对音乐表现提供公平，有意义和信息性的评估至关重要。有许多外部因素可以影响评价判断的质量。以前的研究使用了不同的测量模型来检查评估判断的质量（例如，概括性理论）。与经典测试理论及其扩展的先前分析方法有局限性。在这项研究中，我们使用现代测量理论（Rasch测量理论）来检查评估判断的质量。利用了许多方面Rasch评级规模模型来调查与马来西亚大学学位相关的音乐性能评估中的rater活性测量的程度（159名学生，24位评估者）。我们检查评级规模结构，评级级别的评级，以及物品的判断困难。我们还检查乐器子组（键盘，弦，木风，黄铜，打击乐和声带）的互动效果。结果表明，评估者中严重程度的差异存在差异。本研究的结果还表明，当评级不同的乐器亚组时，评估者具有不同的严重性水平。本文纳入了对音乐表现评估中的研究，理论和实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号