• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists >Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
【24h】

Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

机译：陈述偏好研究的当代指导

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
机译：本文提出了针对陈述性偏好（SP）研究的当代最佳实践建议，这些建议可用来为决策提供信息，其基础是同行评审文献的积累。这些建议考虑使用SP方法来估计使用和不使用（被动使用）值，并涵盖广泛的SP域，包括或有估值和离散选择实验。我们专注于在环境和人类健康的背景下对公共物品的应用，但同时也考虑了建议的建议可能适用于其他常见应用领域的方式。这些建议认识到SP的结果可能会被政府机构和非政府组织使用和重复使用（收益转移），并且必须考虑所有此类应用。预期结果是一套针对SP研究的指南，该指南比原始的美国国家海洋与大气管理局（NOAA）蓝带专家组关于或有估值的指南更为全面，与现代应用息息相关，反映了自从那时。我们还区分了积累了足够的研究以支持建议的实践和仍存在较大不确定性的实践。本文的目的是提高用于支持决策制定的SP研究的质量，并促进将进一步加强这些研究在全球范围内的实践的研究。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Robert J. Johnston; Kevin J. Boyle; Wiktor (Vic) Adamowicz; Jeff Bennett; Roy Brouwer; Trudy Ann Cameron; W. Michael Hanemann; Nick Hanley; Mandy Ryan; Riccardo Scarpa; Roger Tourangeau; Christian A. Vossler;

  • 作者单位

    Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA;

    Virginia Tech Program in Real Estate, 430A Bishop-Favrao Hall(0715), 1345 Perry Street, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;

    Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, 515General Services Building, University of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2H1, Canada;

    Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra 2600, Australia;

    Department of Economics and the Water Institute, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada;

    Department of Economics, 435 Prince Lucien Campbell Hall, 1285 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA;

    School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO Box 875502, Tempe, AZ 85287-5502, USA and the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California Berkeley,207 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310, USA;

    Department of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, Scotland;

    Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2QN, Scotland;

    Durham University Business School, Durham, UK, Department of Business Economics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, and the Department of Economics, Waikato Management School, Hamilton, New Zealand;

    1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA;

    University of Tennessee, Department of Economics, 916 Volunteer Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Choice experiment; Choice modelling; Contingent valuation; Guidelines; Nonmarket valuation; Questionnaire; Stated preference; Survey; Welfare;

    机译：选择实验;选择建模;或有估值;准则;非市场估值;问卷;陈述的偏好;调查;福利;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号