• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision-making Strategies
【24h】

What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision-making Strategies

机译：人们想要从专业人士那里得到什么：对决策策略的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Attitudes toward four types of decision-making strategies-clinical/fully rational, clinical/heuristic, actuarial/fully rational, and actuarial/ heuristic-were examined across three studies. In Study 1, undergraduate students were split randomly between legal and medical decision-making scenarios and asked to rate each strategy in terms of the following: (i) preference; (ii) accuracy; (iii) fairness; (iv) ethicalness; and (v) its perceived similarity to the strategies used by actual legal and medical professionals to make decisions. Studies 2 and 3 extended Study 1 by using a more relevant scenario and a community sample, respectively. Across the three studies, the clinical/fully rational strategy tended to be rated the highest across all attitudinal judgments, whereas the actuarial/heuristic strategy tended to receive the lowest ratings. Considering the two strategy-differentiating factors separately, clinically based strategies tended to be rated higher than actuarially based strategies, and fully rational strategies were always rated higher than heuristic-based strategies. The potential implications of the results for professionals' and those affected by their decisions are discussed.
机译：在三项研究中，研究了对四种决策策略的态度：临床/完全理性，临床/启发式，精算/完全理性和精算/启发式。在研究1中，将本科生随机分为法律和医学决策场景，并要求他们根据以下各项对每种策略进行评分：（i）偏好； （ii）准确性； （iii）公平； （iv）道德； （v）它与实际的法律和医学专业人士用于决策的策略具有相似性。研究2和3通过分别使用更相关的场景和社区样本扩展了研究1。在这三项研究中，在所有态度判断中，临床/完全理性策略往往被评为最高，而精算/启发式策略则倾向于获得最低的评分。分别考虑两个策略差异因素，基于临床的策略往往比基于精算的策略更高，而完全理性的策略总是比基于启发式的策略更高。讨论了结果对专业人员及其受决策影响的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号