首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >An Australian perspective on product compliance and conformity for glazed facades
【24h】

An Australian perspective on product compliance and conformity for glazed facades

机译:澳大利亚对玻璃外墙产品合规性和合规性的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What do Melbourne, Dubai and West London have in common? Sadly, they are the homes of the Lacrosse building, the Torch Tower and the Grenfell Tower and the most significant façade fires in recent history; none so sad as Grenfell with the tragic loss of so many lives. As thesecities, and in fact the world, set about identifying and replacing the non-compliant aluminium composite cladding façades of thousands of high-rise buildings, you might ask ‘what does this have to do with glazed façades and windows?’ Cladding systems may include additionalcomponents such as windows and glazed doors or buildings may simply be clad in glazed systems. This paper seeks to identify where glazing and glazed façades fit within the Australian regulatory framework for building and construction and how conformity is validated and compliance policed.
机译:墨尔本,迪拜和西伦敦有什么共同点?令人遗憾的是,它们是曲棍球大楼,火炬塔和格林菲尔塔的房屋,也是近期历史上最严重的立面大火;格伦费尔(Grenfell)如此悲惨地丧生了如此多的生命。随着安全,乃至整个世界开始着手识别和替换成千上万幢高层建筑的不合规铝塑复合立面,您可能会问:“这与琉璃立面和窗户有什么关系?”包括其他组件,例如窗户和玻璃门或建筑物,可能只是简单地覆盖在玻璃系统中。本文旨在确定玻璃和玻璃幕墙在澳大利亚建筑和建筑法规框架中的适合位置,以及如何验证合格性并监管合规性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号