• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Ain't Nothin' Goin' On But The Rent?: or, How do you make a loss of rent claim work? Part 2
【24h】

Ain't Nothin' Goin' On But The Rent?: or, How do you make a loss of rent claim work? Part 2

机译：难道不是要租吗？：或者，您如何使租金损失理赔工作有效？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Part two of this paper continues to analyse a landlord’s ability to include in a claim for damages at the end of a lease a sum representing the loss of the rent the landlord would otherwise have been able to receive from a new tenant, had the outgoing tenant not delivered up thepremises out of the covenanted-for state and condition. The paper considers and contrasts the conceptual basis for such claims and discussing the conceptual issues arising from the special rules in respect of claims for damages for disrepair properly so-called, which flow from the case ofJoyner v. Weeks and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, Section 18. The paper proposes a solution for the difficulties these special rules cause in respect of the general law of causation in damages claims. The paper examines both the legal and the valuation challenges in mounting such claims.It gives particular attention to the difficult issues arising with: the length of the period necessary to market the premises, even if they were in repair; the impact of a landlord being unwilling or unable to undertake repair works until the market has improved; and the position of a landlordwho wishes to occupy the premises himself. The paper concludes with a practical, step-by-step procedure for the calculation of such claims (which is also conveniently summarised in a flowchart). This is intended to guide practitioners through the process of making such a claim as simply aspossible. Part one of this paper was published in Journal of Building Survey, AppraisalandValuation Volume 7 Number 4.
机译：本文的第二部分继续分析房东在租赁期满时要求赔偿损失的能力，该金额代表了如果离开的房客本来可以从新房客那里收取的房租损失不能将房屋移出所约定的状态和条件。本文考虑并对比了此类索赔的概念基础，并讨论了因适当的所谓的失修损害索赔特别规则而产生的概念性问题，这些规则源于《 Joyner诉Weeks案》和《 1927年房东和房客法案》 ，第18节。本文提出了针对这些特殊规则在损害赔偿要求中的一般因果关系法上造成的困难的解决方案。本文探讨了提出此类索赔的法律和估价方面的挑战。它特别关注以下方面所引起的难题：即使在维修中，也必须将房屋推销所需的时间；业主不愿或无法进行维修工作直至市场好转的影响；以及希望自己占据房屋的房东的位置。本文以计算此类索赔的实用的分步过程作为结束（也可以在流程图中方便地进行总结）。这旨在指导从业人员通过提出尽可能简单的权利要求的过程。本文的第一部分发表在《建筑测量杂志》上，评估价值第7卷第4期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号