• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >What is the proper measure of the expenses of making good under Section 7(2) of the Party Wall Etc. Act 1996?
【24h】

What is the proper measure of the expenses of making good under Section 7(2) of the Party Wall Etc. Act 1996?

机译：根据《 1996年党墙等法案》第7（2）条，制造费用的适当措施是什么？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This short paper considers the judgment of Her Honour Judge Taylor in the Central London County Court on 11th February, 2014 in the case of Jack Breuer v Alba Leccacorvi [2014] PLSCS159. The learned judge concluded that compensation under s. 11(8) of the Party Wall Etc. Act 1996 (ie, expenses paid in lieu of the carrying out of work to make good damage) were payable under ordinary common law principles on the basis of diminution in value. This paper challenges that judgment. It argues that the particular wording of s.11(8), which refers to 'the expenses of such making good', clearly indicates that compensation is payable on the basis of the cost of rectification. Earlier case law has made it clear that common law remedies are supplanted by the statutory regime of the Act.
机译：这篇简短的文章考虑了2014年2月11日伦敦中央郡法院法官泰勒（Taylor）法官对杰克·布劳耶（Jack Breuer）诉阿尔巴·莱卡科维（Alba Leccacorvi）[2014] PLSCS159一案的判决。博学的法官得出结论认为，根据《 1996年党墙等法》第11条第（8）款（即代替进行工作以造成良好损害而支付的费用）应根据普通法的原则以价值减少为基础支付。本文对这一判断提出了挑战。它辩称，第11条第（8）款的特定措辞提到“制造这种物品的费用”，明确表明应根据整改费用来赔偿。较早的判例法已明确表明，该法的法定制度取代了普通法的补救措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号