• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Payments under Section 11 (11) of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996
【24h】

Payments under Section 11 (11) of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996

机译：根据《 1996年党墙法》第11条（11）款进行的付款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is generally known and accepted that under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 when 'building owners' make use of building works carried out previously by their neighbours, the 'adjoining owners', they will have to pay a 'due proportion of the expenses incurred by (the neighbour) in carrying out that work'. This seems to be perfectly reasonable but complications can arise when there has been a change in ownership and where there is more than one owner under the Act of the property in respect of which the work was carried out. Some surveyors apply the principle that unless the current adjoining owner actually incurred expenses in carrying out that work no payment is due under 11(11). Others believe that if building owners wish to enclose on a party wall built as part of the original building they must pay the due proportion under 11(11). A typical example is when a building owner wishes to extend into the space beside the 'back addition' and make use of the type 'a' party wall that is the external wall of the neighbour's 'back addition'. Neither of the established references on the workings of the Act have much to say on the matter, which may suggest that any complications are more to do with surveyors than the law itself. The position turns out to be relatively straightforward and is summarised in the comment on the sub-section in both editions of The Pyramus & Thisbe Club's 'The Green Book'.
机译：众所周知，根据《 1996年聚会墙等法》，当“建筑物所有人”利用其邻居，“毗邻业主”以前进行的建筑工程时，他们将必须支付“适当比例的费用”。 （邻居）从事这项工作所招致的”。这似乎是完全合理的，但是如果所有权发生变化，并且根据《财产法》，有不止一个所有者进行工作，则可能会引起麻烦。一些测量师采用的原则是，除非当前的毗邻所有者实际承担进行该工作的费用，否则根据11（11）无需付款。其他人则认为，如果建筑物所有者希望在作为原始建筑物一部分的建筑物的围墙上封闭，则必须按照11（11）的规定支付一定比例。一个典型的例子是，当建筑物所有者希望延伸到“后添加物”旁边的空间中，并使用“ a”型宴会墙时，它是邻居的“后添加物”的外墙。关于该法案运作的既定参考文献都没有太多要说，这可能表明，任何复杂性与验船师有关的多于法律本身。事实证明，这一立场相对简单明了，在《 Pyramus＆Thisbe Club》的两个版本的“绿皮书”的小节中对此进行了概述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号