...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation
【24h】

Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation

机译：标记自己的作业：行业自我调节的实用和道德合法性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When is industry self-regulation (ISR) a legitimate form of governance? In principle, ISR can serve the interests of participating companies, regulators and other stakeholders. However, in practice, empirical evidence shows that ISR schemes often under-perform, leading to criticism that such schemes are tantamount to firms marking their own homework. In response, this paper explains how current management theory on ISR has failed to separate the pragmatic legitimacy of ISR based on self-interested calculations, from moral legitimacy based on normative approval. The paper traces three families of management theory on ISR and uses these to map the pragmatic and moral legitimacy of ISR schemes. It identifies tensions between the pragmatic and moral legitimacy of ISR schemes, which the current ISR literature does not address, and draws implications for the future theory and practice of ISR.
机译：行业自我监管（ISR）何时才是合法的治理形式？原则上，ISR可以为参与公司，监管机构和其他利益相关者的利益服务。然而，在实践中，经验证据表明，情监侦计划通常表现不佳，导致人们批评这种计划等同于标记自己作业的公司。作为回应，本文解释了当前的情监侦管理理论如何未能将基于自利计算的情监侦的实用合法性与基于规范认可的道德合法性区分开来。本文追溯了有关情监侦的管理理论的三个家族，并用它们描绘了情监侦计划的实用性和道德合法性。它确定了ISR计划的实用性和道德合法性之间的紧张关系，而当前ISR文献并未解决这种紧张关系，并为ISR的未来理论和实践带来了启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号