...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights?
【24h】

Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights?

机译：权利与企业社会责任：减贫和社会经济权利的竞争或补充方法？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Following the situation of poverty in the rights paradigm, this paper explores the links between the rights-based and corporate social responsibility (CSR) approaches to the realization of socioeconomic rights in the broader context of an emerging recognition of CSR as private regulation of business behaviour. It examines complex theoretical and practical dimensions of responsibility and potential contributions of businesses to poverty alleviation and clarifies the apparent paradox of legal compulsion of essentially voluntary CSR activities. Rather than treat rights and CSR as parallel approaches to protecting socioeconomic rights, it is argued that CSR can be part of a coherent framework of laws and policies for legally translating broad human rights commitments to poverty reduction into concrete programmes. The paper demonstrates how legally propped CSR arrangements can support poverty reduction and appropriate task-specific contextualised definitions and boundaries of CSR that complement the rights-based approach. It is argued that human rights principles have normative dimensions to guide and help formulate policies, programmes and practices, which in turn allow for a creative use of and legal prop to CSR. The conceptualization of human rights is not restricted to one implementation method, and CSR can partly satisfy states' human rights obligations and transcend the narrow conventional human rights discourse on obligations of non-state actors.
机译：遵循权利范式中的贫困状况，本文探讨了在新兴的企业社会责任作为商业行为的私人监管的广泛背景下，基于权利的企业社会责任（CSR）方法与实现社会经济权利之间的联系。它研究了责任的复杂理论和实践层面以及企业对减轻贫困的潜在贡献，并阐明了本质上是自愿的企业社会责任活动在法律强制方面的明显悖论。有人认为，企业社会责任不是将权利和企业社会责任作为保护社会经济权利的平行方法，而是可以成为法律和政策连贯框架的一部分，以将对减贫的广泛人权承诺合法地转化为具体方案。本文证明了合法支持的企业社会责任安排如何能够支持减贫以及适当的，针对特定任务的情境定义和企业社会责任的边界，以补充基于权利的方法。有人认为，人权原则具有规范性的维度来指导和帮助制定政策，方案和做法，从而反过来又可以创造性地使用企业社会责任并为其提供法律依据。人权的概念化不仅限于一种执行方法，企业社会责任可以部分满足国家的人权义务，并超越狭narrow的关于非国家行为者义务的常规人权论述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号