• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity
【24h】

Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity

机译：组织灵活性与专业化对开发或勘探的绩效影响：吸收能力的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although ambidexterity is usually cited as a mean to achieve above average sustainable performance, theory indicates that due to trade-offs between exploitation and exploration at an organizational level, sometimes ambidexterity may be beyond reach, or ineffective, making specialization in exploitation or exploration, the more advisable course of action. However, there is no empirical research comparing the performance implications of ambidexterity and specialization in exploitation- or exploration-based types of innovations and the factors that may make each strategy more favorable. To fill this gap, we empirically test that absorptive capacity moderates the effects of ambidexterity and specialization in exploitation or exploration on firm performance. Using a sample of 281 manufacturing companies, results indicate that ambidexterity has a greater effect on performance at high levels of absorptive capacity, while specialization in exploitation or exploration is more effective at low levels of absorptive capacity.
机译：尽管通常将歧义性视为达到高于平均水平的可持续绩效的一种手段，但理论表明，由于组织层面上的开采与探索之间的权衡取舍，有时歧义性可能无法实现或无效，这使得开采或勘探专业化，更可取的行动方案。但是，尚没有任何经验研究可比较以灵活性为基础的专业化对基于开发或探索的创新类型的绩效影响以及使每种策略更有利的因素。为了填补这一空白，我们进行了经验检验，表明吸收能力缓和了开发和勘探过程中的灵活性和专业化对公司绩效的影响。使用281家制造公司的样本，结果表明，在高吸收能力水平下，歧义度对性能的影响更大，而在低吸收能力水平下，专门从事开采或勘探的行为更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号