首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda?
【24h】

QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda?

机译:QCA和业务研究:正在进行的工作还是合并的议程?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in its different variants has become increasingly prominent over the last years in business and management research. While this notable trend is, in general, more than welcome, the applications in the field have to hold against some minimal standards of the QCA community. This study is based on an assessment of 61 published, peer-reviewed journal articles applying QCA within the field of business and management studies. It demonstrates several major and minor flaws and presents several suggestions on how to overcome these shortcomings or avoid them in the first place. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的几年中,在业务和管理研究中,不同形式的定性比较分析(QCA)变得越来越重要。通常,尽管这种明显的趋势非常受欢迎,但该领域的应用程序必须与QCA社区的某些最低标准相抵触。这项研究是基于对61篇在商业和管理研究领域应用QCA的经同行评审的期刊文章进行的评估。它展示了几个主要和次要缺陷,并就如何克服这些缺点或首先避免它们提出了一些建议。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号